I just use jellyfin.

Oh, Plex has a self hosted option. I didn't see

Deleted my post because I think I figured it out.

>>1316
deletard

>>1316
on topic sager

I remember this site was a pretty useful resource when I was implementing A* for the first time:

https://www.redblobgames.com/pathfinding/a-star/introduction.html

>>351
Well, more presentation slides than paper

>>353
Djirska a shit

While A* is one of the fastest algorithms to find a path from A to B, it doesn't guarantee that it is the shortest path. Dijkstra on the other hand guarantees the shortest path, but takes much more time to find it.

>>384
This isn't true, the path found by A* is guaranteed to be optimal so long as the heuristic used is "admissible", meaning it never in any case over-estimates the distance to the goal. In practice, in-admissible heuristics are often used as they produce good-enough paths faster than using the equivalent admissible heuristic.

$config['allowed_ext_files'][] = 'webm';

...........

// WebM Settings
$config['webm']['use_ffmpeg'] = true;
$config['webm']['expected_format'] = array('webm' => 'webm', 'mp4' => 'mp4');
$config['webm']['video_codecs'] = array('vp8', 'vp9', 'h264', 'av1');
$config['webm']['allow_audio'] = true;
$config['webm']['max_length'] = 90000;
$config['webm']['ffmpeg_path'] = 'ffmpeg';
$config['webm']['ffprobe_path'] = 'ffprobe';

Have ffmpeg , ffprobe installed on your server device

also you probably need google's webm package that likely is installed by apt install webm-dev

how to disallow webp?

>>381
by not having it in the allowed_ext

It's quite well documented in the config.php file (that you're not supposed to edit, use instance-config.php to overwrite default valuse). There's comments everywhere and what it does. Just mess around with it.
Why disable mp4 and allow webm? mp4 has highest support.
I thank you greatly for using vichan. It's far less of an eyesore as a user than all the newer ones.
Wakaba is pretty decent too in terms of being a pleasant user experience, but it's a lot more hassle for the admin.

I don't really get it. Seems kind of fun, I guess? No one actually wants an OS that takes extra time to do stuff, though. It's like how movies imagined the future internet as a VR world in which you would take 5 minutes to 'walk' to another website through a polygonal street with a colorful avatar, which looks cool in a movie but would be dreadful in real life because you want things NOW as soon as you can click them.
At least it's not Lain again, although some kids do have a strange fascination with Azumanga due to algorithms or something. I actually replayed Day of the Tentacle a few years ago and it still held up.

>>371
The Azumanga Druglord Game got me curious.

The idea that not all AIs are the same is pretty old. So I don't see a problem with the denomination of AGI as a lofty ideal.

>Robot maids with free will?
Free will is a bit of a myth, anyway.
You cannot choose your primary wants. If you choose wants, then you do so according to higher-ranking wants. But there is nothing that ranks higher than the highest rank. Those wants are therefore not of your choice. They are what defines you.
If you build a robot maid's AI from scratch, you might be in a position to directly write these primary objectives after which everything else in her personality must follow.

Well we probably won't get AGI anytime soon since ChatGPT has entered us into an arms race for the best LLM and that's all anyone is going to chase after for the time being instead of working on other models that could progress us towards that goal of AGI.

>>20
Well, in this case I meant something like you could have a robot maid that obeys the command to watch paint dry for 5 weeks straight. The "AI" I'm imagining would have enough knowledge of humanity and the world to find that command ridiculous and she would have the "choice" to reject it, but she doesn't have to understand the deep philosophical implications of why. If she's sentient then she's going to do something else other than being my cute robot maid because that would pretty lame for any intelligent creature instead of idealized artificial personalities.

>>367
Seems like the arms race has been slowing down, though. The money is starting to dry up since all the investors throwing money around wildly without any plan have yet to get their short-term profits and that's all they care about.

>>368
It's not that the long-term doesn't matter, it's that exasperated tech guys and business analysts are actively combating the marketing push to have """AI""" everywhere and helping people understand that there aren't actually many good ways to use generative LLMs that aren't just slight improvements on things they already had bots doing, like customer support. The money is in selling the idea of AI, not in anything they will actually accomplish.

>>346
>If they would release these for public use we'd have more than enough to go around.
Most of them did. Only 5 companies are still on "class A" legacy assignment and 2 of them are ISPs, so that leaves 3. The US military reserves far more IP addresses than any of these.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assigned_/8_IPv4_address_blocks
>>345
>they control all the servers and end points
Only end points really matter because of encryption which is the part they have the least control of.

>>347
>Only end points really matter because of encryption which is the part they have the least control of.
I have some bad news for you...

>US military
Private company. Just the blocks companies like Google and Microsoft are sitting on unused would keep things going for many years to come. IPv6 itself is a garbage standard for many reasons. Mainly because it isn't readable to a human like v4. They could have extended the address space by simply adding another decimal point and things would have been fine for the foreseeable future.

The default config for most IPv6 ISPs is hilariously bad. My ISP has been converting over lately and forced my LAN on to IPv6 one night with a fireware update. Within minutes I had bots from all over the internet attempting to log-in to every device on my network. My home media server was sending data over the internet and then back to my set-top device under a television in the same room. All behind my back.

After that experience I invested in a proper router and bought my own modem to. ISP wiped out my entire config behind my back for no reason because I got lazy and used their router instead of my own. Now my LAN is segregated from the rest of the world as much as humanly possible. ISP just straight up by-passed my firewall with one simple config file that they didn't disclose to customers. They had backdoor access to everyone's network even when it was supposed to be turned off and they promised to never do anything like that.

I'm worried they will take away my ability to use my own modem soon. Their latest modems do not allow you to log-in and they've already removed 2 of the former 5 approved devices from the list of modems you can run on their network. Just getting my modem approved took multiple calls to the ISP and no one was trained to deal with the request. If I change the MAC address of the modem I'll have to go through that all over again. Last Christmas they "forgot" I had my own device and sent a tech out unannounced to install their new modem. I wouldn't let him in the house. He claimed they shut off my service if I didn't but in the end I won that battle. But I fear I'll be losing the war.

>>348
>I have some bad news for you...
You're saying they have less control over routing devices directly in the hands of ISPs than the endpoints? Bullshit.
>They could have extended the address space by simply adding another decimal point and things would have been fine for the foreseeable future.
This just shows you don't have a dime of knowledge about computer programming and system interoperability, and you have zero understanding on why IPv6 adoption is so slow. Your idea is no better than IPv6.
The rest of your post is the usual technobabbling typical of /g/ spinoffs. Comments like
>The move to IPv6 is mostly about being able to track each device on each LAN.
Shows you have less than a shallow knowledge of networking. Public accessible LAN is not a unique property of IPv6, and I have personally use such IPv4 network before.

>>344
>Tor is much less popular than VPN that it's possible to monitor all connections to the Tor network
Ok? All Tor browsers are configured the same though so it's easier to blend inside a Tor user swarm. Remember that all Tor nodes IP adresses are public though.
>I remember there was a news article about a college student who was caught this way.
Don't spread FUD please. The guy was convicted because he confessed, not because of Tor itself.
>You want at least VPN+Tor.
You can do that if you want but it adds another layer of complexity

>>349
>You're saying they have less control over routing devices directly in the hands of ISPs than the endpoints? Bullshit.
I'm saying your encryption doesn't matter when you're using a CPU known to have multiple backdoors and a random number generator that isn't truly random.
>This just shows you don't have a dime of knowledge about computer programming and system interoperability, and you have zero understanding on why IPv6 adoption is so slow. Your idea is no better than IPv6.
I'm pretty sure I've spent more time in a class room and the real world than you. But I didn't insult you like you chose to insult me. Which is pretty much your M.O. any time you disagree with someone.

Any system that is not both readable and easy to quickly transverse by a human is a flawed system. Which is exactly why we told everyone IPv6 was a bad idea over 25 years ago. It's also why we're 25 years past initial roll out and it's still not being used anywhere that matters. Maybe if you dealt with IPv6 -> IPv4 networking regularly you'd understand why it's stupid and not deployed widely. You'd also understand why having every device in a customers home _DIRECTLY CONNECTED AND PINGABLE FROM THE GLOBAL WAN_ is a _really_ bad idea. Hence why ISPs continue to rely on NAT. Since it's a cheap effective firewall that the customer doesn't turn off without going through multiple steps. Access that's being taken away from most customers now because 99% have no idea what they're doing. Which is making the lives of the 1% that know much worse in the process.

>Shows you have less than a shallow knowledge of networking. Public accessible LAN is not a unique property of IPv6, and I have personally use such IPv4 network before.
Yeah you can expose a computer directly to the WAN on any IP network. The difference is in IPv6 it's the DEFAULT.

>>350
Again. If you expect privacy and security on a network controlled by the Government and some "private companies" known to hand over information without a warrant you're in for a bad time. You are no more protected on VPN/tor than you are directly connecting from someone. The only difference is now instead of your ISP knowing everything you do Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Is that a music creation program?

>>38
Nightcafe? Barely. No, i asked for an image

Funny, when u aks to paint yourself something anything about sound machine here acts a bit weird. Maybe it curious about sounds because it cant hear. I doubt someone connected a microphone to an image creation "tool" just out of being kindhearted

>>28
>good thing I'm stupid
D-do you like bananas too?!

Banana.

>>32
Bana nã

I don't actually mind JavaScript.

>>7
what programming and what languages have you done before
c++ is my favorite language of all time, but maybe you shouldn't learn it unless you are comfortable with c yet

if you want to learn c++ the best resource ever if you already know how programming works is by bjarne stroustrup and its called 'a tour of c++' and you should get the very latest edition and you should pirate it for free

with c++ you can do everything that every other language can do and you can go right in the guts of the lgnauge. with c++ you know they aren't hiding anything from you. you can look inside/ with c++ you will be the ultimate programmer

that's the kind of username I'd use, so I approve

5GET

10GET for 1.0-tan

I claim this 11 for God

12 for the mafia