>>38519the posts I reported were the
only ones I had a problem with, not a "type" I disagree with. The only "type" I think should be deleted on sight without mercy are the ones that seem as if they were lifted straight from 4/g/, calling things they don't like as being the result of "shills", "glowies", "le [blank]", or obvious template posts. Those are not "60% of the replies on kissu"
I think "funpost in fun threads, be serious in serious threads" applies, generally. That's why I called that privacy thread shit. The OP was explicitly serious and yet after the fourth reply, the replies got derailed by meta concern trolling about how "this was posted on multiple imageboards".