No.34460
I did my monthly search for kissu mentions on 4chan and found
https://boards.4chan.org/jp/thread/48050503It's kind of interesting that moderation is lax enough to allow that thread. I wonder if we'll get anyone from that place, although the comment of kissu being "too /a/" is a bit concerning to me. But, I'm just not as big on Touhou as I used to be...
More Kuon converts?
No.34464
do we really want to import people who won't adapt to the kissu way?(NO KUON?)
No.34465
Also an anon mentioned they like the self-hosted cytube thing so that's a plus and maybe something we should be pushing!(WHERE IS KUON?!)
No.34467
the "too /a/" comment was just made by an anon that wanted to bitch about all imageboards, I don't think it's the worst criticism kissu could receive. Perhaps if it was "too modern /a/" it would be bad, perhaps it if was "too Kuon" it would be better
anyway these threads have been going on for a while but moderation generally deletes them, it's a wonder when they survive for more than a week. And from all of the past threads in the last year and so I'd say most people there have a favourable opinion of kissu; in fact, most already seem to browse kissu, even if they're not actively posting that much.
kissu was also mentioned in another thread I go to this past month but there the reaction was way more negative, unfortunately.
No.34468
>>34467post it, i want to see what they said and if there were any mentions of kuon
No.34469
>>34468you probably saw it as well already
no kuon unfortunately
No.34470
>mailto:kuon
I really, really want to send mail to Kuon
No.34569
Personally, I don't think it's /a/ enough. I'm assuming that poster just prefers talking about 2hus instead of anime because the main problems with /a/ are the generals and the mods and we don't have those here.
No.34571
no, kissu is really /a/-like if compared with the /jp/ spinoffs
like extremely so
No.34573
>>34571The fuck does that even mean.
No.34576
>>34573i know what he means
you gotta feel it
No.34580
>>34571>compared with the /jp/ spinoffsWhich are all dead and also shit. It's not the "/a/" that's weird, it's the "too".
No.34584
>>34580>Which are all deadAlive enough for me
>and shitDebatable. For the most part yeah, but not always.
>it's the "too".some people just don't like /a/ at all. Most of the /jp/ spinoffs have little to no /a/ influence. The post was clearly comparing different alternative imageboards; among them, Kissu was judged the most /a/-like, and this is something that some people don't like. Not a big group of people by any measure. Probably people involved with the spinoffs.
No.34588
sagers
No.34589
to be fair you have to have a very high IQ to understand what is an /a/-like board. The differences in humor are extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of /jp/ culture most of the complaints will go over a typical poster's head. There's also /jp/'s pessmistic outlook, which is deftly woven into the catalog of the board - the multiple generals draw heavily from disc*rd chats, for instance. The /jp/sies understand this stuff; they have the intellectual retardation to truly appreciate the depths of one word posts, to realize that they're not just pointless - they say something deep about MODERATION OF THE BOARD. As a consequence, /a/-like posters truly ARE idiots - of course they wouldn't appreciate, for example, the quality of the multiple 2hu imagedumps, which itself is the kind of content that should rather be in /c/. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those ret/a/rds scratching their heads in confusion as sitting 'mu's genius unfolds itself on their 'puter screens. What fools... how I pity them. And yes by the way, I DO have a flanfly tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for /bant/'s eyes onyl - And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 500 pictures of my own vtumor reaction folders (preferably lower) beforehand.
No.34662
>>34657No, I didn't. The /bant/ text is a reference to a well-known poster that posts here also.