No.3829
(From the male perspective)
Results color code:
Red - Very pleasurable
Yellow - Feels good
Green - Feels okay
Blue - Neither good nor bad
Black - Painful
The Astolfo Erogenous Zones images roughly lines up with these questions.
No.3830
>Black - Painful
Can't find it. Where is the black circle?
No.3831
>>3830>Can't find it. Where is the black circle?Whoops. It's the eyes for reference. It shows up as purple in the results. It looked black from the color picker. The image is just one from 4/qa/ a long time ago that I saved that I like posting every now and then so it doesn't line up 1:1 with this poll.
No.3832
please don't lick eyeballs
No.3833
How can you say you love her if you can't even lick her eyes?
No.3834
File:0193a.jpg (Spoiler Image,591.48 KB,1110x1600)
No.3835
as much as I dislike anus kissing it'd be nonsensical to call it gay, unless you think rimming contains within itself the germ of desiring insertion up your ass
others can be odd, i can't recall seeing a man having his tum kissed, or girls kissing male feet which is surprisingly unintuitive
>Mouth / Lips>1meme vote
>>3834dem orbits
No.3838
Many of these are really weird and I'd question anyone who wanted to do them, but I've limited my responses purely to the ones that would increase the levels of homosexuality in your partner.
I don't know why armpits would be gay instead of just gross and stepping on a woman's face seems pretty masculine to me. Explain yourselves.
No.3839
>>3838Who wouldn't want their body licked all over by cute girls?
>>>/megu/1837
No.3841
>>3840I dunno, that's certainly not what the poll suggests.
No.3842
>>3840you're a wackosexual
No.3843
I often have the feeling that people confuse their own sexual interests for heterosexuality, because they identify as heterosexual. That then leads to weird assertions.
"Only homosexuals would want to have sex in a car."
"Only homosexuals would want to have sex with a woman younger than 20."
"Only homosexuals would want to have sex with a girl wearing socks."
The entire debate seems both meaningless and paranoid. Arbitrary check-boxes to test for a question that can in fact be asked and answered independently: Are you sexually attracted to men/women/both?
The fact that there is apparently no distinction between being licked by cute girls (as per the thread topic) and being licked by handsome boys, is not surprising. It's par for the course. You are using "homosexual" to mean "abnormal". But they are not the same thing. And image board users are abnormal by default. I'll bet some of you don't even have facebook accounts.
No.3844
>>3843It's a joke from /secret/, or as the olds would put it, a site meme
No.3845
>>3844Should I apologize for spoiling everybody's fun times?
No.3846
>>3845No no, it was a good post!
No.3847
i'm just gonna FUCK astolfo
No.3849
>>3843>And image board users are abnormal by default. I'll bet some of you don't even have facebook accounts.That's such a weird indicator of normality
No.3852
>>3850Would you have sex with one fat?
Would you have sex with a cat?
No.3853
>>3852I would not have sex with anyone fat.
Even you wouldn't a cat.
I do not like sex with a man.
I do not like it, Anon-I-Am.
No.3854
>>3853You do not like men, so you say.
Try it, try it and you may!
Try it and you may, I say.