No.1069
It does have multiplayer as well, that would get you some more time and value out of the game.
I'm not interested in the game so I won't play it and I don't know if the multiplayer would be good though.
No.1070
>>1068If the game was $30 maybe $40 I would say it's well worth the price, since there are still 6 coop side-missions and pvp to do. But $60 is a lot to stomach for a game like this.
If the roadmap is to believed (I wouldn't ever trust one of these), there should be more single player content in a year. So it might be best to wait a year and see how things turn out if the price doesn't drop.
No.1072
>>1068I bit this shab before
>>1071 purged it.
No.1073
>>1069On the first week of release
No.1075
Xenos species sidelined by chaos again. Other than that it looked fine, I'd have to grab it on a steep sale though. Multiplayer doesn't sell for me.
No.8731
>>1070Haven’t heard anything from this game even though we’re past the end of year one… Did it fall off the face of a cliff or something?
No.9104
>>8731They're still updating the game and posting things to their twatter and website, but for general interest I'd say it's par for the course of a singleplayer game. If you're hooked you're already paying attention but if not it's just not being shoved in your face anymore, like BG3 and KCD2 fell off for the most part and you gotta go to the sources of stuff.
https://community.focus-entmt.com/focus-entertainment/space-marine-2/blogs/229-june-community-updateHere for example, they're already detailing their plans for after that initial year one roadmap since they've gotten to all of it from my skimming of their blogposts and releases.