>>3767
He's right, though.

>>3767
You don't need ph*losophy. In fact, you need to be without ph*losophy. If your anything had ended up being a ph"losophy — retrack your steps.
Basic metaphysics, logics, or etymology are everything you need. Any more and you become a dysfunctional lardass, unless you had been spending efficient effort morphing your cybernetic existence towards The Holy Metabolism, but that's mostly for entertainment. Most people, including those into ph*losophy, never foster a virtue enough for it to grow into multitudes of true virtues, and it shows too much to ignore it. No philo, no sophy, all perfunctory.

He's obviously right, though.

>>3768
>>3770
More souls lost to cold anglo logic..........
>>3769
And this one has been possessed by the shadow of anti-philosophical philosophy............

There is a reason the most genius and influential of modern philosophers, Kierkegaard & Wittgenstein, were generally against philosophy as commonly understood

It took me a bit to realize he meant that option 3 is better than option 2. What a retard. Making Fallout real is obviously a way better outcome than my genetic legacy abruptly ending.

The typical "My life sucks so therefore the life of other people suck so therefore everyone should die" type of thing. At least he's not a politician... or is he?

>>3772
you mispelt Kant.