We better be in the timeline where Minna no Ginko grows to become an international megacorporate bank just because people around the world wanted to m*sterbate

I don't use DLsite myself, but that's great news. Though this whole situation made me think: What's stopping entire banks from refusing to provide service to platforms they dislike? I'm sure there are anti-discrimination laws of some sort to enable free banking, but I can't imagine there aren't any loopholes like saying a platform isn't an individual and should therefore be allowed to get refused if the bank deems cooperation with it to be potentially damaging to its reputation.

>>38677
>What's stopping entire banks from refusing to provide service to platforms they dislike?
Competitor banks that don't refuse

So the fix is "just do a bank transfer directly from a japanese bank account"?
very cool and useful solution to precisely nobody who is on this website.

>>38679
Or just live in Japan

>>38679
you require an elevated spirit to carry out this transaction

>>38675
article is fine but why use a slur in the OP for no reason?

I don't buy games.

>>38683
I mostly used DLsite for buying doujins and sharing them on panda.

>>38684
Thank you for your service.

>>38679
This thread's customer support speaking.
We're very sorry you did not find our thread useful! We at thread No.162897 seek to provide satisfactory service to our users, and we're very thankful for your feedback, which is very important to us.
Not only our management shall address your concerns immediately, but also, as a token of goodwill and a supplement to our official apology, we have distributed 250 Kissu Coins to your bank account.*
Looking forward to working with you more in the future! Have a nice day!

*If you receive no such payments within the next 3 business days, please contact the customer support of the payment networks you're using and demand compensation as soon as possible.

>>38686
> 250 Kissu Coins
How many shabs can you bite with that?

>>38687
Not even one in this economy...

>>38676
that would be great but still even if it's Japan only for now, i'm happy to see resistance towrds visa and mastercard at all

>>38689
This really doesn't matter. Japan had a chance to break free in the late 80s. They chose to kill off their up and coming tech industry instead so they could continue selling shitbox sedans in America. They had a chance to be the leader in the up and coming cell phone market in the mid-2000s. They killed off their own industry so they could continue building shitbox sedans and SUVs in America.

They are fully under the control of the US Government which is owned by the banks. Their island is a US air force base. They will do as they're told.

>>38690
For what it's worth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BTRON#Trade_Issues

Go read the actual sanctions. They were really horrible. This is why they were tied to the hip to PC-98 through the 90s and Windows to this day. Same thing happened with their domestic cell phone production and it's why Apple got a near monopoly in Japan quickly.

The yen is tied directly to the USD. The only way they're breaking free is war (note: I support an independent Japan and hope they grow some balls like they did in the 1930s).

>>38691
by "like they did in the 1930s" you mean try to genocide the Chinese for literally no reason besides "lol the army was bored"? the world is a better place now that japan isn't trying to murder everyone

Remake the thread again without culture war crap in the OP that has in turn altered the course of the thread to bring up more garbage unrelated to the enjoyable atmosphere we want on kissu.

I guess I can move it to /secret/ though...

>>38693
>Cosplay Complex
is it about a building complex for cosplay or cosplay being complex

>>38694
There was no culture war crap.

>>38694
You are far more annoying that people having a friendly conversation about the state of the world

>>38698
If you guys want to do the "WAR AGAINST THE KIKES!" thread, can you at least do it on /secret/?
There were two reports for the OP and then when I finished waking up to see the thread I shared their feeling.
I already avoid moderating with my own feelings since I've learned I'm distant from others here, a rusty relic, but 2 reports when most people avoid reporting at all is enough to take action.

>>38699
or rather 3 reports since if I wasn't a mod I'd report it

>>38692
It's really odd to see people on a site like this gushing over imperial Japan.

It's arguable that the biggest beneficiaries of WWII were the biggest losers, Germany and Japan. The US obviously came out on top overall, but it had a pretty big head start already. If we're looking at things in terms of relative improvement, Japan and (West) Germany experienced astronomical economic, technological, and cultural growth. And the effects of this era can still be felt to this day; both countries are still in the top 5 biggest economies in the world, and Japan specifically has one of the largest culture industries worldwide.

Why you would want to see Japan go back to the way it was before it modernized is a mystery to me.

>>38699
I didn't read the rest of your post because the first sentence is pure projection. You took the bait posted by someone attempting to derail. They baited you to move the thread and now you're being a sperg as usual. Just like when you monitor the weekly streams from a logged in account so you can de-anonymize the people just trying to have a good time then get angry and threaten to ban them for making a joke or two. It's a (you) problem not a >us problem.

Further more, the fact that you're concerned about "culture war crap ruining the comfy board" in the first place just goes to show you showed up sometime after 2016.

Again; you faggots are more annoying that people that actually want to rant about the kikes. People have been ranting about politics on the internet since before the web was a thing. They didn't need "containment boards" or to be shoved away into some dark corner. People knew how to ignore them.

A conversation about banking a trade disputes and the state of things isn't "culture war" shit or "politics" either.

Good job. You've managed to censor everyone for no reason and annoy them. Typical mod behavior that has ruined every last place on the internet in the last 10 years. Par for the course. Only the most annoying of faggots seek out moderator positions.

Hello Mods, my ability to say kike as a mod is being oppressed, help.

>>38702
of course YOU'D say that when you take every possible chance to write walls about the real world and glowery and cry you're being gangstalked when people tell you to fuck off

>>38702
I saw a thread on an imageboard about WAR AGAINST THE KIKES, with reports against it, and I agreed and moved it to board where such things are talked about instead of deleting it.

>Further more, the fact that you're concerned about "culture war crap ruining the comfy board" in the first place just goes to show you showed up sometime after 2016.

Do you not adjust your angst for the location you're posting on? kissu didn't exist until late 2018. If you're asking when I started using the internet, my family got Prodigy in '93 or '94 although I was a kid at the time. I don't remember people barging into websites to redpill the sheeple back then, websites had boundaries.

In earnest, I think it's more of the same puritanical fucks who want to kill all fun things because they thing fun is antithetical to Christ than anything really Jewish. I just think it's fun to call them kikes because of the money and banking aspect.

always have to exercise caution when calling people kikes you don't want to devalue it

>>38707
Exactly, you have to treat calling people kikes like a currency, something kikes know a lot about.

>>38708
kikes may call kikes kikes and nonkikes alike so if you strike be light like a shrike

>>38679
>very cool and useful solution to precisely nobody who is on this website.
we need to invite patio11 to kissu

>>38682
always use slurs

>>38704
>>38705
Let me tell you what I know. I know I can rant and rave and discuss politics on here all day as long as they're friendly towards Chinese people or jokes about America being a land filled with gun totting fat asses. I've that happen multiple times. Then I've watched anyone that kindly asked for such people to STFU or challenged their bullshit get banned with extreme prejudice.

So don't even pretend like you're unbiased or interested in protecting the comfy. Just like every other disingenuous retard mod on the internet you only use such things as a convenient excuse to ban anyone you happen to disagree with it. Don't think you're being sly either. It's pretty obvious someone here took offense because I joked about Japan having balls before the 1940s. Which is why those mysterious oh so important reports you claim you must address for the good of everyone happened to roll in just after someone brought up the Chinese unprompted and then started posting
>dur hur gas the kikes
when no one mentioned it prior.

Was there cheese pizza in this thread? Was there a threat to murder someone? Were social security numbers or the address of a supreme court justice posted? No? Then you stepped outside of the bounds of what you're supposed to be doing and you know it.

Have some balls. If you're going to be a tyrant just be up front and say you're swinging around your ban hammer and touching the moderator tools because it's the only little piece of power you have in your life over other people. I've watched you do this over and over again for the last two years here, on the IRC channel and on the weekly streams. If you really wanted to participate and have fun you wouldn't be logged into a moderator account 24/7. Nor would you be so eager to use the mods tools just because someone sent in a report over nothing.

You know I bet someone got offended by you dumping 20+ images in the manner of seconds of anime girls dressed like nuns. Maybe they should spam mass reports until we're no longer allowed to post shabs in cosplay.
>Kissu didn't exist before 2018
No shit. I was making the point that you have brain rot because you've been coddled your entire life and you think you're supposed to moderator an imageboard like it's whatever discord channel you're lurking in all day.

>>38704
God forbid people are literate and have a discussion you disagree with. You could you know. Simply not read such posts or go into such threads.

It's like /maho/. You claim you want a technology board. But really you just was a consumer whore board where we discuss how to generate hentai using AI tools none of us built.

Maybe some of us want to actually discuss technology. It isn't my fault the cutting edge is nanobots, spying on end users, collection of metadata, building datacenters for the security net, launching satellites and building cell towers to have the bandwidth to power all that and all the other things.

At least I have sources, and insight, and experience. When you're just rude, name call and make shit up. Thankfully, I'm smart enough to ignore the annoying bullshit you post constantly. YOU are the one shitting the place up. Not me. If you want this level of discourse you could stay on /g/ or pretty much any other website. They're all neatly censored so you never read anything you disagree with and it's obvious you spend most of your day on such places and regurgitating the bullshit you read there. Because again; you're probably 12 years old.

Explain to me how OP is supposed to post a thread about this subject in a way that isn't "political" without meaning the banks. Kind of hard to do that isn't it? When the entire point is by-passing Mastercard and Visa which is just moving USD around.

You know I could be a massive faggot and cry about every thread being politics too. It isn't hard. I can tie it to everything and fear monger about how it's going to ruin the board forever if it's allowed. I could spam reports too. I doubt you'd take them serious. But for some reason you always rush in to coddle this one faggot. Probably because you're sharing pictures of your cocks with each other offsite somewhere or something. I don't really care. It's just annoying is all I'm saying.

>>38713
>Which is why those mysterious oh so important reports you claim you must address for the good of everyone happened to roll in just after someone brought up the Chinese unprompted and then started posting

I'm the mod who made this thread and I can tell you the reports were:
>New report for post /qa/ #162897
>Reason: <span class="quote">&gt;CC kikes</span>
and
>New report for post /qa/ #162897
>Reason: low quality

And knowing how Cool is, he didn't appreciate the /v/-isms of the OP or how I called the CC companies kikes for their greedy behavior either. Though I don't really know how any of this is related to any culture war because hating greedy jews in banking is a more universal thing.

I bet if I reported the post that says >Please visit the Wplace thread and help us "mog" (hope I'm using this correctly) the other imageboards. citing that mog is a 4chanism, that cool-guy would delete it SIGHING about how his hands are tied and he has to trust the judgement of the dumb reportard

>>38715
snopes says that word doesN'T appear in that thread sorry

>>38716
I mean the post >>>/qa/162881

>>38717
citation verified, asking command for permission to fire the mortar

I won't report it. I think the post is fine.

>>38714
'Culture war' wasn't a good term to use, yeah, but I couldn't think of anyone else to say since I had just woken up and was really groggy.

>>38713
I'll reply to this once and then disengage from the Sisyphean task of convincing a conspiracy theorist that he isn't the main character of existence and that my life isn't centered around him.

>I know I can rant and rave and discuss politics on here all day as long as they're friendly towards Chinese people or jokes about America being a land filled with gun totting fat asses... Just like every other disingenuous retard mod on the internet you only use such things as a convenient excuse to ban anyone you happen to disagree with it.
I sense that you're upset that there are threads for deepseek and other Chinese AI models and confuse it as worship for the country/government instead of talk focused on the tech itself. Jokes are simply jokes so I don't know what you'd want me to do about the "lol America is fat" posts, if there are even any of them around. Usually it's Americans themselves making those jokes.
If it doesn't derail or kill the atmosphere of a thread, which 99% of the time it doesn't, I can't take action.

>Then I've watched anyone that kindly asked for such people to STFU or challenged their bullshit get banned with extreme prejudice.
It's pretty crazy that you've seen bans that the mods themselves haven't seen.
We don't ban; we delete or move posts/threads. Bans are reserved for crossboard spam. Don't invent delusions of oppression.

>It's pretty obvious someone here took offense because I joked about Japan having balls before the 1940s.
The OP was reported, the posts were more of a reinforcement to show that the thread was destined to worsen the atmosphere of kissu, so it was moved to this corner where it can be "topical" instead of ruin people's mood.

>So don't even pretend like you're unbiased or interested in protecting the comfy.
Everyone has biases, but I am indeed very interested in protecting the comfy. I restrain myself from removing all of it because people on kissu generally don't want a nenpo-like experience of curated saccharine.

>dur hur gas the kikes
>when no one mentioned it prior.
The OP did.

>Was there cheese pizza in this thread? Was there a threat to murder someone? Were social security numbers or the address of a supreme court justice posted?
I take action so the atmosphere doesn't become a cesspit like 4/g/ where such things are expected since it's downstream of everywhere else and has become the "I'm banned everywhere else, this is my home" cesspit. Cultures don't die overnight, it's death from a thousand cuts.

>If you're going to be a tyrant just be up front and say you're swinging around your ban hammer and touching the moderator tools because it's the only little piece of power you have in your life over other people.
This is childish and cliche, but I'm being unfair to the good kids that know better.

>I've watched you do this over and over again for the last two years here, on the IRC channel and on the weekly streams. If you really wanted to participate and have fun you wouldn't be logged into a moderator account 24/7.

My name on the stream is Anonymous specifically to bring less attention to myself and I log out after I finish loading the shows. I log in when a channel host action is needed like skipping black credits and then I log back out. It does indeed worsen the experience to be logged in as a mod. Like IRC, for moderation purposes people only exist as hashes on kissu theater. On kissu itself I only log in to check for reports, I prefer the UI of being logged out and imageboards are far worse overall when you're logged in as a mod. I think you're imagining scenarios in your head where I do things that you would do in my position.

>Nor would you be so eager to use the mods tools just because someone sent in a report over nothing.
If you think it's "fun" to moderate a place instead of simply being a user you should try doing it sometime. It's simply wonderful to check a few times in bed when you'd rather be relaxing, or feeling worry when it's been a couple hours since you've looked at the screen and you're unsure if other mods are busy. The dread of someone having their day ruined because you weren't able to moderate the really bad stuff in time is a constant worry.

>You know I bet someone got offended by you dumping 20+ images in the manner of seconds of anime girls dressed like nuns.
That wasn't me. Anyone with a kissu pass can dump images that quickly on a board designed for dumping images.

>I was making the point that you have brain rot because you've been coddled your entire life and you think you're supposed to moderator an imageboard like it's whatever discord channel you're lurking in all day.
It's kind of funny you accuse me of hanging out in discord when your own vocabulary of "brain rot" shows that you're around such places so much that it influences your manner of speech. "Coddled my entire life"? What does this even mean here? You're so very immature.

You're replying to someone else in the latter part of the post, but I'll respond too:

>Maybe some of us want to actually discuss technology.
I have a feeling you want to discuss people instead of technology. "Did you know [thing] is actually a conspiracy by [person] and [that government organization] controls [thing] and you're a shill that works for [company/government] if you speak positively about anything?"
Those are examples of discussion about people and not technology.

>If you want this level of discourse you could stay on /g/ or pretty much any other website. They're all neatly censored
I really can't imagine the board of your dreams if you think /g/ is censored. That's like complaining that the brown water runoff from a garbage dump is too clean.

>Explain to me how OP is supposed to post a thread about this subject in a way that isn't "political" without meaning the banks.
He makes it without doing the KIKES thing. This is a "death from a thousand cuts" thing I mentioned above where the culture of a place is nudged towards the bad end. Nothing exists in a vacuum.


>Probably because you're sharing pictures of your cocks with each other offsite somewhere or something
So childish.

Man, what a waste of time it was to reply to all of this. Alas, I am addicted to meta talk.

>>38713
Switching from lowercase to uppercase...
Something I find rather interesting, and fairly relevant, is how you speak of others in the stories you tell. All too often, you describe people as irrational, evil, and/or plain stupid, hardly ever speaking positively of these characters. You, on the other hand, are doing your own thing, you're knowledgeable, you're putting in the work, and these people can never appreciate it or are somehow insulted by it, like the mention of the so-called experts ragequitting in >>>/amv/4451. You mention that there are good people out there, like you gesture in >>>/poll/7966 that you're "sure there are still decent 3D girls around", but the people you focus on the most seem largely irredeemable according to the tales you spin.

By itself, I would find this somewhat suspicious. It's weird for someone to be so consistently surrounded by horrible people everywhere they go, it's certainly not my experience, or that of anyone I know. But looking at the context and your pattern of posting here on kissu, you strike me as someone with less social awareness than a low-functioning autist. You don't understand, or pretend not to understand, that the things you post impact the atmosphere, even though it's kept happening many times across the year or more that you've been browsing this site for. You keep complaining about getting banned in many different places, but the fault is always someone else's. Always, every time. Even though you should understand by now that posting a rant on 3D women isn't exactly a mainstay of this site, or that a casual meeting of Yu-Gi-Oh isn't the same as a competitive tournament, that there are rules and expectations you should show a modicum of care for. You've failed at grasping yentexting for so long that people stopped pointing it out to you, because you don't seem to register such things at all.

I find you quite interesting as a character, because you are either totally oblivious to these conventions, or you actively choose to disregard them whenever you preach the gospel like a stuck-up Evangelical, chainsmoking in your room while pretending to work against the cabal of cabals. You're not even good at profiling people, as demonstrated by your blunder of telling cool he's somehow new to the internet or accusing regular users of being feds. You make for a very peculiar case study.

Not a mod, by the way. Just a guy who can discuss the real world without getting his shit nuked.

>>38719
I appreciate it. I was in a better mood than usual and thought I'd throw in a funny-sounding newspeak term in a way I felt is more funironic rather than reddironic, hoping maybe it would make some anons do that quick exhale through the nose before they ignore me and go on with their usual posting about feet and all those Kissu things.

Why not just delete the posts trying to stir shit?

>>38723
mogging is cute because it sounds like a cat thing
moggy

>>38751
He can't because his internet friend would cry in his DMs all day. Same reason why he's let him rant about politics on the IRC channel for years and banned anyone that complained about it.

>>38722
It's almost like I only speak negatively of people when citing an example of the few people in my life over the years that have been horrible people.
>You don't yentext
Wow Alt+a key so hard. I better shape up and fit-in instead of simply typing > out of habit or when I'm quoting someone while lampooning them because that's exactly what they did to me first.

I have never once been rude to anyone first here. Yet someone takes what I posted out of context, projects whatever boogeyman of the month upon me they've picked up from social media lately then uses it to name call me all while avoiding the actual discussion. Then I'm somehow the bad person despite them going through every bad faith avoid the argument method out there. Typically, while pretending to be too-cool-for-school 2015 circa average 4chan retard. But I used "brain rot" once after watching the person I'm arguing with toss out child of the internet slang for over a year. So I guess that makes me the real discord user.

I didn't accuse anyone of being a fed. I accused them of sitting in some chat room together and adopting the language fed-types have spammed all over the internet for the past 10 years. Which they have. Just like they seem to have this need to track down years old posts on far away imageboards I might or might not have made. Or posts by other people they think might be me. Which always seem to be followed up quickly by the same 3-4 people with the same typing habits all of the time. Funny how that happens. It's almost like they're being annoying assholes that do nothing but spend their day on the internet trolling around looking to start arguments because they have nothing better to do with their lives.

>bans the mods don't see
If you can't even keep up with what your own moderators are doing we have larger problems than I thought. I know of 3 people personally this one person has either banned for no reason or ran off by being an asshole for no reason. Typically, for the same reason I dislike him: He goes on and on about shit no one wants to hear like today's MSM headline or ranting about American politics. Which for you information are two things I couldn't give less of a fuck about because I'm 100% checked out on both MSM and social media at this point. But I'm well informed since he's always ranting about it to no one in particular. Reply to him. Disagree. Do it anonymously. The pattern of him crying loudly then to moderation to have the evil outsider ban always follows. Then it's right back to more of his politics. Which was my entire point that you seem to have missed. You like most other people these days want to pretend you're on some high horse and you're above what "ruined the internet 10 years ago". But you're either too young or too dumb to remember that it wasn't people being open to one another and sometimes discussing politics. It was the CENSORSHIP or certain views on this or that subject that caused the outrage and problems. Something you seem all too eager and happy to repeat. Or you're naive to it and don't care because your friends are the moderators. Wouldn't be the first time that has happened.

I notice with even you that you cite one or two posts I made in responce to something that bothered you for whatever reason. But you don't bring up the other odd-100 or 200 I might have made this year. Probably because they weren't long form, they weren't serious, they weren't made in responce to something I found to be retarded or wrong or something where I was attempting to be helpful. Most of the time I don't go full novel unless provoked. Someone usually rudely calls me a name, demands proof of whatever I talked about then promptly either stops posting or simply ignores any proof I'm so kind to spoonfeed them. It isn't like I'm making these type of threads. I have no made one that I can recall. I have never come here and posted my personal politics and strong opinions as the OP of a thread. I have no name called. I have not been overtly racist. I have not used a script to spam or otherwise did anything to be an annoying faggot. I haven't complained about anything else someone else posted. I haven't reported a single post (maybe CP once). I haven't called for anyone to be censored. I haven't cried to moderation in private. I haven't broken any rules knowingly. I have been very civil as I am most everywhere I go.

I certainly haven't dug up someone else's posts from elsewhere on the web, posted them in an unrelated thread, then called them rude names while claiming they should be medicated and that they're insane because they think they're being stalked. Which is an way to behave in the first place.

In that case I even went out of my way to apologize because the same person has been following me around picking fights for a long time. I didn't come crying to have the posts deleted. I didn't care. Same retard has been following me around for awhile at this point. I don't know why he's so infatuated but sadly I'm just not that into him. I do not understand why you would go out of your way to read a bunch of shit you claim you don't like in the first place. All those options to keep on scrolling and he chose to read everything I wrote anyway. Shame he didn't respond in good faith. Maybe some kind of middle ground could have been reached.

Your friend whoever it is. I don't care about his name. He's certainly new to me. Since he acts like a fag and his shits all retarded. Maybe it isn't me who's bad at profiling someone. Maybe it's you that's got the same problem as he does.

>>38758

>Try moderating sometime
I have. For years and years. Millions of users. Multiple times. Multiple websites. Wrote the code too. You're welcome.

>Just a guy that can discuss the real world without getting his shit nuked
Maybe the things you have to say don't matter that much? Ever think of that? Maybe you have nothing important to say.

For the record; I don't complain about bans. Since they're useless and there is nothing real behind swinging the ban hammer anyway. Any retard can evade it as we all know.

What I've complained about is biased moderation, over moderation, dishonest moderation and most importantly: Cowardice in moderation and administration. Mostly self censorship. It's always the same excuse. We don't allow _that stuff_ here because it'll ruin the comfy/draw in the wrong types/get the server v&. But we're going to talk about _this stuff_ which is really just _that stuff_ with whatever our personal opinion on _that stuff_ happens to be. You can reply all you want if you agree with me.

Or the good old "Here are 20 autistic rules that could have been covered by "be civil".

Take this thread for example. Are we going with OP said kike so the thread is bad now? Okay. Then it just proves the point. A civil discussion was happening just fine before it was moved to the shadow realm where it'll never garner good faith discussion again. OP was reported? Wow I wonder who could be behind that! No way it's the person that came along and shat on the carpet. Better punish everyone and move it quick. We don't have the ability to edit one word out of the OP, leave a mod note in the OP and delete those two problem posts. Common sense moderation wouldn't work. Better move it instead and blame it all on the one guy being civil and having a friendly discussion with random anon #9,384.

>you want to discuss people not tech
The two are intertwined. But since we're on the subject. In the IRC channel last year I was happily discussing /tech/ several times. Only for the same person to come over and over again and derailing about stupid modern /g/ talking points. You couldn't discuss init systems for UNIX without him ranting about systemd. You couldn't discuss UNIX OSs that aren't systemd+Linux without him ranting about systemd and barfing up shitposts from /g/. You couldn't talk about Jellyfin without him yammering on about Plex and how you're schizo if you think it's collecting metadata on end users (turns out I was right about that being a problem, right?). You couldn't talk about C without him bringing up Rust. Pretty much any attempt to have a discussion was instantly shit up by one person. Who while easily ignored was very annoying. But he eventually drove the few people away to other places because he became too much noise to deal with. Couldn't even talk about jails without him praising Docker images for some reason.

Well the last time I lurked the IRC from the imageboard interface I saw an anon asking for help with self hosting video content. He was asking if I was around. I didn't respond because I didn't want to deal with the idiot. Idiot claimed everything "werks on my machine" anyway so surely he would be kind and help that person.

You know what he did? A few minutes later he's linking to MSM article about what Donald Trump did today. Ranting about Americans and how Canada is number one and all that. Same shit he does every day.

But I guess you don't see that stuff, right? I guess you have to lurk around as often as I do to notice that pattern. Which is about once in every six months.

But the tight knit we talk offsite everyday and gossip group of friends has decided I'm the evil outsider that doesn't know anything. I don't parrot the right memes. I'm out of touch with the hip children of the internet circa 2010s who miss the good old days of 2016 /jp/ before it went to cancer (aka two-three years after everyone left).

You are right about one thing. I do not fit in and for that I'm very glad.

Maybe you should consider the fact that I post far more often than you think I do and most of the time I'm not posting more than a paragraph at a time. Well that and maybe I might know what I'm talking about now and again. Not that anyone seems that interested in having an actual discussion. Name calling is kind of the last resort of a man with no arguments after all and I seem to get a lot of that in return whenever I do bother to put in the minimum amount of effort into a post.

>>38758
>I notice with even you that you cite one or two posts I made in responce to something that bothered you for whatever reason. But you don't bring up the other odd-100 or 200 I might have made this year.
Well, he can't see your posts, so yeah of course he can only see what he wants to link. Whenever someone has tried to complain personally about your posts I've always brought up that if I look, they're only ever seeing the loud ones.

>Take this thread for example. Are we going with OP said kike so the thread is bad now? Okay. Then it just proves the point. A civil discussion was happening just fine before it was moved to the shadow realm where it'll never garner good faith discussion again. OP was reported?
I was never even consulted on my thread being moved, there was no conspiracy behind the scenes to kill off my thread because you were posting in it. Cool just didn't like some quirks about it and sent it here.

>>38760
cute socked footies

verbal diarrhea narcissist baby outrage

>>38759
Oh and while I'm still here. Whichever one of you threw a shit fit because I showed anon how google tracks users over multiple websites by pointing out you're embedding javascript from their CDN. You need to grow up. I could not believe someone would get so offended by an image. No one accused you of anything. Well nothing more than being a lazy webdev like every other lazy webdev that embed scripts from these large companies.

It's not "schizo shit" to point out they easily track what end users do with such things and tracking pixels. Some us were around for the early days of the web and helped developed this technology.

I would have been more than happy to explain that it was also a combination of his own device/cell phone. But you got super butthurt. Then threatened to ban anyone that dares post a screenshot of noscript in the future. You looked like a child.

I think I like all the posters involved and I bring you guys a Koupen to ease the tension.

>>38765
have a kuromi-chan instead

>>38766
thank you do you think koupen and kuromi would get along

>>38765
Koupen!

>>38768
kuromi is mean but she has a good heart deep down

Anyone else heard about the DLSite thing we should make a thread about that

>>38807
Is this a gag or did something new actually happen?

>>38832
It was a failed jab at the derailment of this thread