[ home / bans / all ] [ amv / jp / sum ] [ maho ] [ f / ec ] [ qa / b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new ]

/poll/ - Polling and Honesty

use for asking the community

New Reply

Options
Comment
File
Whitelist Token
Spoiler
Password (For file deletion.)
Markup tags exist for bold, itallics, header, spoiler etc. as listed in " [options] > View Formatting "


[Return] [Bottom] [Catalog]

File:ffe551d5844a464cdfe732546….jpeg (1.16 MB,2508x2657)

 No.7609




[View Responses]

Is 0→1 morally justifiable?

 No.7610

What are we arguing about?

 No.7611

File:R-1755909485118.gif (308.73 KB,500x281)

¥ 0→10

 No.7612

I don't understand. Do you mean there's no in-between for the bottom one? Yeah, I guess that makes sense.
Making shape morphs for a gradient body shape is more difficult than binary stuff, though.

 No.7613

>>7609
Is this in relation to body sliders?
If so as much variety as possible thanks, which I guess means 0-1
Though honestly more games need completely uncapped sliders like modded sims to allow you to create your perfect fetish/abomination

 No.7614

File:swimsatoko.jpg (1.19 MB,1410x1458)

>>7609
Yessss

 No.7615

>>7610
>>7612
>>7613
it's about giving fat to flatties
the artist's feeling is that going from an already-fatard baseline (1) to very fat (10) is good, but going from flat (0) to fat (1) is bad

 No.7616

The way I understand it is that it's alright if girls with standard bodies get drawn fattened up for more fetish potential, but it's not for lolis and / or flat chests because that's part of their appeal, therefore drawing them differently is bad? Kind of like removing a character's ahoge or drawing a kudere with emotions.

 No.7617

I will fatten up all lolis

 No.7618

0 -> 100 but boobs only for me no I will not apologize

 No.7620

>>7618
this guy stalks elementary schools while wielding an oppainator 9000
>>7617
this guy instead goes around giving away tons of cake for free

 No.7621

>>7615
Oh, I suppose there's some merit to that
We associate chubby girls with fertility and harboring strong children
To give that to a flat chested girl is sort of like denaturing them

 No.7622

>>7615
Hmmm... I guess that kind of makes sense. I wouldn't say it's a "crime", but... it does make sense.

 No.7624

Fat is OK if the girl remains really tight and pert and NEVER SAGS.

 No.7625

>>7624
Proposition 1: fat is morally permissible if and only if it does not sag
Proposition 2: in all possible worlds, fat necessarily sags
Conclusion: fat is necessarily impermissible

 No.7626

File:image_27.jpg (239.11 KB,1448x2048)

>>7624
>Fat is OK
Yeah

 No.7627

File:weneedtogoflatter.png (127.66 KB,2508x1387)

OP is thinking entirely in the wrong direction

 No.7628

Obviously it's evil. On one range you're just getting fatter. In another you are turning something good into something fat. It's just not right.

 No.7629

File:C-1755932988773.png (1.51 MB,983x1500)

in normal circumstances I'd agree, but unicorn single-handedly changed my entire worldview. She used to be flat but I'm guessing throughout the updates she grows up or whatever.
It might be simply because she's perfect though.
This also heavily depends on whether the character design would work with different breast sizes. Same with how a person's hair color would make you look weird and different if it doesn't really match the rest of your look, characters innately look like they should have flat or large breasts. unicorn is perfect with both, if she existed in a superposition of flat and large, i would know that god exists and he brings miracles.
The biggest sin though? Taking a character that either has large breasts or is flat and making it average size. the average-sized-breast faction is the enemy.

 No.7630

File:886c5a38a7109dddbf5c16a552….jpg (85.73 KB,350x500)

>>7609
¥ anything <-> anything else




[Return] [Top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]

[ home / bans / all ] [ amv / jp / sum ] [ maho ] [ f / ec ] [ qa / b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new ]