No.7610
What are we arguing about?
No.7612
I don't understand. Do you mean there's no in-between for the bottom one? Yeah, I guess that makes sense.
Making shape morphs for a gradient body shape is more difficult than binary stuff, though.
No.7613
>>7609Is this in relation to body sliders?
If so as much variety as possible thanks, which I guess means 0-1
Though honestly more games need completely uncapped sliders like modded sims to allow you to create your perfect fetish/abomination
No.7615
>>7610>>7612>>7613it's about giving fat to flatties
the artist's feeling is that going from an already-fatard baseline (1) to very fat (10) is good, but going from flat (0) to fat (1) is bad
No.7616
The way I understand it is that it's alright if girls with standard bodies get drawn fattened up for more fetish potential, but it's not for lolis and / or flat chests because that's part of their appeal, therefore drawing them differently is bad? Kind of like removing a character's ahoge or drawing a kudere with emotions.
No.7617
I will fatten up all lolis
No.7618
0 -> 100 but boobs only for me no I will not apologize
No.7620
>>7618this guy stalks elementary schools while wielding an oppainator 9000
>>7617this guy instead goes around giving away tons of cake for free
No.7621
>>7615Oh, I suppose there's some merit to that
We associate chubby girls with fertility and harboring strong children
To give that to a flat chested girl is sort of like denaturing them
No.7622
>>7615Hmmm... I guess that kind of makes sense. I wouldn't say it's a "crime", but... it does make sense.
No.7624
Fat is OK if the girl remains really tight and pert and NEVER SAGS.
No.7625
>>7624Proposition 1: fat is morally permissible if and only if it does not sag
Proposition 2: in all possible worlds, fat necessarily sags
Conclusion: fat is necessarily impermissible
No.7628
Obviously it's evil. On one range you're just getting fatter. In another you are turning something good into something fat. It's just not right.