[ home / bans / all ] [ amv / jp / sum ] [ maho ] [ f / ec ] [ qa / b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new ]

/maho/ - Magical Circuitboards

Advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic

New Reply

Options
Comment
File
Whitelist Token
Spoiler
Password (For file deletion.)
Markup tags exist for bold, itallics, header, spoiler etc. as listed in " [options] > View Formatting "



[Return] [Bottom] [Catalog]

File:C-1754021722820.png (188.88 KB,2212x1036)

 No.4537

Here's a fun little test, go to https://gowinston.ai, put one of your longer posts into it, and then see how distinguishable you are from an AI. I got a perfect score because I'm a superhuman so you should as well. If you don't have a throwaway email you can put into it then go and make one right now because why do you not have one and don't you DARE get a higher readability score then me.

 No.4538

吾輩は人間である

 No.4540

>>4538
This may not be the best place for AI detection... threw in a bunch of different posts and they all came back as 100% human. Detection may be getting too good to be making false positives.

 No.4541

https://decopy.ai/ai-detector/
I googled "ai detector no signup"

 No.4542

>>4541
I tried a few of my longer posts and it flagged both of them with 50-60% certainty, which is funny. It seems to dislike long lists of examples, which makes sense since ai loves to do that shit, but also long sentences in general.
My guess is the detectors try to go by sentence structure and grammar, when the GPT-isms are still so much more obvious to an actual human who has seen them.

 No.4543

File:Screenshot 2025-07-31 at 2….png (176.61 KB,1898x890)

>>4542
lol, lmao. Now I have no idea what metrics it uses. 飽きた、寝る。

 No.4544

>>4537
>readability score
wtf is that bullshit?

 No.4546

>>4543
>metrics
import random
probability = random.randint(0, 100)

 No.4549

File:C-1754030342849.png (170.6 KB,1362x726)

>>4541
OP exposed for trying to run cover for his spambot.

 No.4550

>>4546
don't ruin the magic

 No.4551

>>4549
this seems dubious. There's no way to determine whether a particular string of text is certainly ai-generated or not. As a person you want to rely on recognizing certain manners of speech to sus it out, sure, but the major way of actually condemning a string of text would be looking for inhuman structures, like that dumb -- thing they do that nobody else on earth ever does. Put my paragraph in and see what it says, if I come up as AI too then it's beyond retarded.

 No.4557

File:C-1754051353807.png (128.19 KB,1362x726)

>>4551
Nice try, but your robot tricks don't fool me.

 No.4558

>>4551
>like that dumb -- thing they do that nobody else on earth ever does.
I resent that. I regularly used em-dashes in longer posts until the whole world suddenly latched onto that as an AI bogeymarker. Same goes for semicolons, enumeration in threes, etc. Most grammar and punctuation that lay people call AI-like is just what used to be taught as good style in writing classes.
In my experience, the biggest giveaways are bland vocabulary, needless verbosity, and whatever you call that essay-like structure of "Introduce what you're about to say, then say it, then summarize what you said". That last one goes double when it's used in an informal context or as a reply to a much shorter post.
(Ironically, AI will probably flag this post as AI because I overcooked it.)

 No.4559

>>4549
This might just be because it's full of audio gear keywords, and 90% of all online writing about audio gear is stealth advertising or SEO boilerplate.

 No.4563

File:IMG.jpg (218.01 KB,2048x1536)

>>4537
Scared to show you my results, guys, because this will RUIN the reputation of any of my post I'd test - you'd know I, as the author of the post, am still around (breaks the bittersweet mystique aesthetics of anonymity), and you'd see the analysis and the publication of the results as some narcissistic signaling born out of desire to parasitise on your expressions of validation, all so I'd get the kind of type of self-worth that an anonymous person inherently cannot get by design...

 No.4565

>>4563
What is this parodying

 No.4568

>>4565
The presumption within the question hurts, because this is the real deal (even the AI content scanner agreed with me).

 No.4572

>>4568
The reputation of every single kissu post is already ruined because I already know it's just one guy making all of them.

 No.4579

File:Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 1….png (165.44 KB,1898x890)

at least i can sleep easy now

 No.4583

File:Screenshot 2025-08-02 1039….png (105.22 KB,604x843)

>>4541
pasted one of my posts from dream thread, and this is the result.

 No.4755

File:hamlet.png (186.06 KB,1655x885)

always knew that bard fella was a fucking hack

 No.4756

File:C-1756428905726.png (139.83 KB,1529x681)

Is this what the guy from blade runner felt...?




[Return] [Top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]

[ home / bans / all ] [ amv / jp / sum ] [ maho ] [ f / ec ] [ qa / b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new ]