https://techxplore.com/news/2024-09-korean-ai-cctvs-criminal.html
wich sibyl wood u giv ur rites 2

If a very smart AI, much smarter than all of our current models, detected that someone had an almost guaranteed chance to commit an act of terrorism in the next twenty four hours, would it be lawful to have this person be subject to intense surveillance?

>>3724
no
easy

Anyone here read Brave New World? I checked it out after the Psycho stream and I can definitely see why it appears so often in top 100 lists.

reading died for me not long after I got a smartphone

>>3727
You can totally read on your phone, though. I use ReadEra.

I heard about some company that was claiming to use AI to automate stuff like filling out legal forms and then it turned out they were actually just hiring a bunch of Indians to do it manually because that was cheaper and easier, which was another good PP moment.

>>3724
If the people who can lawfully order such surveillance believe it to be a credible source, yeah.

>>3724
No because I'd murder the head of the AI company and blow up their servers so they wouldn't be able to function at such a high rate of confidence.

More like the Shambala arc

>>3729
amazon also did this
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/apr/4/amazons-just-walk-out-stores-relied-on-1000-people/
wouldn't call it a good pp moment though since sybil is still horribly complicated and exponentially more expensive than regular employees