[ home / bans / all ] [ amv / jp ] [ maho ] [ f / ec ] [ qa / b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new ]

/trans/ - Transparency and Moderation

New Reply

Options
Comment
File
Whitelist Token
Spoiler
Password (For file deletion.)
Markup tags exist for bold, itallics, header, spoiler etc. as listed in " [options] > View Formatting "


WELCOME HELL

[Return] [Bottom] [Catalog]

 No.34277

>>126395
cause it's 18+ and op is a child

Deleted by cool-guy from >>>/jp/126242 Post No. 126686 from thread 126242

 No.34278

>>34277
I can't judge too much since I was 14 when I started browsing imageboards. Moot was around that age when he made 4chan as well.

Also, teens aren't toddlers/small children. Use appropriate terminology.

Deleted by cool-guy from >>>/jp/126242 Post No. 126689 from thread 126242

 No.34279

Isn't Kissu 18+?
Or is it a "Don't mention your fucking age so none of this is an issue?" situation?

Deleted by cool-guy from >>>/jp/126242 Post No. 126690 from thread 126242

 No.34280

>>34279
Kissu is indeed 18+ but tbf i want this thread to remain up even if OP gets banned, it's a good concept

Deleted by cool-guy from >>>/jp/126242 Post No. 126691 from thread 126242

 No.34281

>>34278
>Also, teens aren't toddlers/small children. Use appropriate terminology.
They sound like they're 12 at most

Deleted by cool-guy from >>>/jp/126242 Post No. 126693 from thread 126242

 No.34282

The irony is that people that behave like this are freshly adults and think this is the way to prove your maturity.
OP's posts are worth far more than your "stop having fun" crap.

 No.34283

>>34282
Oh and this isn't addressed to every post I deleted, some of it was collateral replies

 No.34285

im a child ama

 No.34289

I really do think that this should be discussed properly.
Someone who's self-admittedly a minor really has no business being here.

 No.34290

>>34289
We should do what worked perfectly well for all websites in the 90s and 00s. Which is nothing at all, it turned out to work just fine back then. OP of that vocaloid thread meanwhile should lurk more and not make their situation obvious in other threads, that being the other side of the deal.

 No.34291

>>34289
>self-admittedly
She did not admit to it directly though. IF someone does that, then yes, they should be banned, but we only have anecdotal/indirect evidence in this case.

 No.34293

>>34285
lol look at this keeyud

 No.34294

>>34289
That's not our call. If anyone is supposed to dictate what they can and cannot do it's their parents.
Furthermore whether someone is 18+ or not means nothing. Besides the post quality issues of course.

 No.34295

>>34294
>Furthermore whether someone is 18+ or not means nothing
Except that it does, knowingly allowing minor on site like this is literally against the law, and it is something that could bring unwanted attention here if left unchecked.

 No.34296

teens just need to stop announcing their ages

 No.34297

>>34296
This. I'm sure lots of people here started using imageboards when they were underage. But a lot of communities teens/young adults use fetishize victimhood and being vulnerable, so you get social status from announcing that you're a minor. That kind of behavior is looked down on in imageboard communities but someone who grew up without using imageboards, after lurk-before-posting culture died would have no way of knowing that.
I don't think keeping her here is unethical, I was using imageboards too as a teen. Only concern is that it could be a legal liability for the site, but it's probably fine as long as she doesn't admit it on the site itself.
It's a very fun thread so I'm glad it will stay at least.




[Return] [Top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]

[ home / bans / all ] [ amv / jp ] [ maho ] [ f / ec ] [ qa / b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new ]