>>34183>I don't want to normalize the culture of entering a thread of something you dislike to crap on it, even admitting you haven't seen it and then calling people "degenerates".We'd probably draw the lines similarly in practice. Some negative comments and some ways of expressing negativity allowed. This is something where the borders are fuzzy and it'd be better to leave it to the users to set the standard. One guy says "degenerate", next guy says "
>degenerate Shut up". The crux of my disagreement is that I think letting it play out that way is better. If it ends there, all's well. If it blows out into a 20 reply long argument and derails the thread
then it's more justified to step in as a moderator.
>the atmosphere on kissu where people can openly make threads to share their joy.>An undiluted attack on kissu's community. Go back to 4chan.also this reminded me of your usual catastrophizing so I'm calling that hugboxy too. Whereas stuff like this
>I don't want social media reaction stuff on a 2D boardis a test that can be applied objectively, it's the site leadership taking a stance that XYZ content is out, that's reasonable. In astronomy, for a telescope to record Mercury or the sun's atmosphere it must have a disk in the aperture to prevent the light of the sun itself from washing out the fainter object it's imaging. That's how I see rules such as that one.