>>33493
Stop posting kuso threads

Moved by followup

kimo

Moved by followup

>>33494
they're porndump threads that I've been told belongs on /ec/

Moved by followup

>>33496
Your threads are kuso. They don't invite contribution. They're low effort trash that doesn't respect the golden rule of seeding the thread instead of being a drive-by OP that kills threads from the catalog for no reason. You are scum and I hate you. Try posting again when you learn not to behave like a third worlder who just got an internet connection.

Moved by followup

could delete a couple of the useless bumps but as long as it's not full spam then won't

>>33497
WHAT did anonymous MEAN by this

>>33499
Were I moderator for /ec/, this would be a ban. When you create a thread on an imagedump board, it's proper etiquette to post a number of replies to your own thread. This is to differentiate it from being a low effort stealth request thread, and also to give example of what should be posted.

This thread is especially egregious because the OP does not explain what should be posted. There's no topic (e.g. 'Bikinis & Swimwear'), the text of the OP does not relate to the OP image (not glowing?). A strict interpretation of the thread would be extremely niche (glow in the dark bikinis?), which would be fine (See: >>>/ec/10846), but the OP proceeded to post no follow ups. There is no way to contribute to this thread that does not make it at best a stealth request thread, or at worst a thread created out of grievance (>>33496) that killed /ec/ threads for no reason. The fact that they also made a bunch of low effort bumps (See: >>33500) suggests they're not interested in contributing to the board, but are instead making stealth requests. This type of behavior should not be allowed if imagedump boards are to be held to a high standard rather than being filled with low effort posts. An imagedump thread should be more than just a low-effort ecchi hook.

>>33497
Her feet are inside out...Z

>>33505
I would rather /ec/ be closer in nature to what I remember of 4/h/ where people discussed things and imagesharing was just a prevalent part of it.

But the guy seemed to be posting with some kind of animosity towards the idea of /ec/ being used for this purpose.

>>33507
>discussed things and imagesharing was just a prevalent part of it.
Use the other non-imagedump boards to discuss things?

>>33508
No. I don't want to see NSFW content on SFW boards.

>>33505
We never established any 4chan-like rules of "post at least 3 images", but you're correct that it seems to have been made in disagreement over something. I would like OP to clarify what this grievance is because a consensus can never bet met without it.
I think this thread had more /jp/ potential than /ec/ potential because people could make jokes or observations about it. It seems more conversational than visual and the thread would just die out in a day or two. This is contrary to some /jp/ threads that are image-heavy with a bump every few days with a new image that I think belong on /ec/. I can't really see that happening here.

>This type of behavior should not be allowed if imagedump boards are to be held to a high standard rather than being filled with low effort posts
I'm not sure if there was ever any intent for high standards, but I think it's picked up that identity and it has lead to reduced activity with threads from 2022 being around. I know not to post Western artists for example and the preference for certain, uhh, things, has lead to a general /ec/, ummmmm, "body type" you can easily see in catalog view. We did have a few generic-generated-on-website AI threads some random guy made before we told him to condense his generations into one thread and had to do some mod moves. That's the closest thing to quality enforcement I can think of from staff, but my memory is far from perfect.
"Your taste isn't refined enough to post here" is really not something I'm willing to enforce outside of something truly egregious. If everyone enforced their standards it would be quite messy. I'd relish the ability to instantly delete gacha and vtuber characters, though.

>>33510
>I'd relish the ability to instantly delete gacha and vtuber characters, though.
But their /ec/ designs are the thing about them that stands to be appreciated the most.

>>33511
Such is the conundrum of enforcing "high standards" when people like different things.

>>33510
I can't confirm after the dumb deletard purge on /trans/, but I recall there were some comments accusing lewder threads on /jp/ of being "porn dumps". I can't really speak for OP, but I think it makes sense he's annoyed after being told to take it to /ec/ and then see it's not welcome there either.

>>33505
>>33510
true we should move >>>/ec/17932 to /jp/ because OP is a fag and didn't continue his imagedump

>>33513
>I recall there were some comments accusing lewder threads on /jp/ of being "porn dumps". I can't really speak for OP, but I think it makes sense he's annoyed after being told to take it to /ec/ and then see it's not welcome there either.
I appreciate how OP stuck it to the moderators and forced them to eat their words.

>>33513
>being told to take it to /ec/ and then see it's not welcome there either
botemin...

>>33517
skill issue

>>33514
I see the point you're making. I guess I'll reiterate what I said elsewhere on /trans/ just now and suggest someone make a /b/ thread about /ec/'s purpose and identity going forward.
I don't personally think a sexy image by itself should get moved to /ec/ as /jp/ has a history of such threads, but if the intent is for image dumping or nudity then it should be on /ec/.

>>33526
This is going to be met by dismotivating autism.

>>33527
Massive meta threads and kissu are natural friends.

sexualize the friends(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST)