No.42598
dumb banevadingtard
No.42601
Divisive mod disagrees with deleting this and is reposting so it is now a meta thread.
Do you want /pol-g/ threads on this website
No.42603
>>426011. I don't see this thread as /pol/ish.
2. I do not want /pol-g/ or /pol/ish threads threads.
3. However, despite this not being a /pol/ish thread, I would not want for the site to go where this thread goes, in that kind of e-social e-community e-basho direction, if you intuitively grasp what I mean.
No.42606
>>42601I don't know anything about Lucky Star but the OP makes it sound like the joke is that Akira wants to run over Shiraishi because she doesn't like him, not because he's a liberal. And no, I don't want /pol/ threads on this site.
No.42608
>>42603This is why you need dictators... Terry Davis posting is /polg/ posting
No.42610
>>42601I do not want any mention of IRL politics on the site in any capacity even with additional context, it's pointless and will only lead to worse things
No.42611
(nevermind the backlink)
I'm referring to moderator practices. That you guys are too stupid to see the context behind people posting so you require staff who will so things you don't like for the benefit of public safety
No.42613
>>42612Liberal is not an apolitical term
No.42614
kissu is on edge lately...
No.42616
>>42615>>42613What definition of "politics" fo the participants of this discussion have a consensus on?
No.42623
running over people is bad
>>42601no
No.42624
>>42614For an imageboard about taking it easy the userbase sure seems pretty miserable.
No.42625
>>42624I'm doing fine, thanks
No.42629
>>42627>at most I'll ask why they did it so that it doesn't happen again or explain my reasoning if a misunderstanding needs to be cleared upI wish more people did this. It could nip so much pointless drama in the bud.
No.42632
>>42618In the most surface-level way it can carry a political connotation, but then so do plenty of anime by way of having messages about slavery or drugs or whatnot. Yani Neko or GiTS now become harmful political anime to be deleted by your childlike standard.
>>42616I would say the definition of what is 'politics' in the sense of what people want to avoid on a website is the culture war or American left-right ideology collision. Pointless political bickering that accomplishes nothing and only serves to get people roused. Although here people will probably want to avoid any sort of ideological discourse at all even if it's elevated above the usual standard of online political discourse because having said discourse at all is a magnet for the lower level of it.
No.42634
>>42632NTA but, for the matter, those entries are about universal politics, that is, societal cybernetics (not in tech sense but in systems sense), they aren't orbiting some IRL stuff.
No.42637
>>42627 (me)
>while being under somebody else's roofLet me rephrase that actually: while
willingly being under somebody else's roof
>>42628That's even worse then. You're """standing up""" for someone who doesn't need or want you to do it and creating completely needless drama. Somehow an even bigger waste of time.
But I'm not really telling you anything new here, am I? You doubled down on it after all, so you are completely aware of the fact that it is a waste of time for everybody involved you included, it just doesn't bother you as much as you have nothing better to do with your time. Luckily I do though, so I'll just leave you with this on the off-chance that my earlier assumption about your intentions is wrong before going off to better spend my time elsewhere.
No.42639
>>42638meant to quote
>>42623Yes I'm a dumb forgettard, i know
No.42640
>>42638god i wish i was reimu
No.42644
>>42636>the joke isn't even ABOUT 'libtards'Okay but why
here has to be a joke where the hate for some political group has to be the medium? Humor is based on benign transgression and a transgression of putting up hateful and tiresome American politics isn't benign for
here, people are tired of it and practically try to avoid it by coming
here.
To define what kissu is (for), one has to define what it isn't (for).
No.42645
>>42614its hard not to be... i cant afford gas or any new pooter parts and its getting harder to stick my head in the dirt and pretend its all ok
No.42647
>>42646Me too! Let's barter potatoes for
s*x!
No.42648
>>42644This somewhat hinges on the definition of 'liberal' being that of a political group in the context of the original video or not. So I should probably post that,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tB5zXwHPOGo and then you can see that there isn't any sort of meaning to the word. There's nothing to indicate the person as belonging to any political affiliation. The farmer simply uses "liberal" as a means to define "any person annoying me". As such it becomes not a hateful term against a group, but instead a blanket term with no meaning which could be substituted with anything else.
No.42650
>>42648>The farmer simply uses "liberal" as a means to define "any person annoying me". As such it becomes not a hateful term against a groupTo paraquote Deleuze and Guattari, when a schizophrenic carpenter keeps building something wooden and it ends up being a chair without him even understanding the context of a chair or a concept of a chair in the process, it's still a chair.
¥ what?Well, you see, when I was a kid and I had drawn my naked young aunt crudely, just to show off my originality and skill, I was scolded, and I believe that was a reasonable thing to scold me.
¥ what?I exaggerated her pubes, but, later, now in adolescence, while accidentally peeping on her I noticed that her pubes didn't actually grow that much, and were of lighter color, and I'm only connecting the dots just now. I was actually factually inaccurate, regarding that drawing.
¥ what?I think we can have jokes with reasoning-impaired redneck naivety elsewhere that isn't kissu.
No.42651
>>42650That's fair enough, I found that first post to be the weaker of the arguments I'm making. Mainly the assumption is
>>42649, that we should be able to interpret an anime joke appropriately without resorting to a surface-level critique of the dialogue.
>had drawn my naked young aunt crudely, just to show off my originality and skill>I exaggerated her pubesSo you like hags, do you?
No.42652
>>42636If you raise your index and middle finger in Australia with your palm pointed inwards, that's the equivalent to giving someone the finger over there.
Of course, it might not be your intention to do so, and you can explain that it's not offensive where you're from all you want, but the key point is that you're doing it somewhere where it IS offensive. A symbol only has meaning because a group of people collectively agreed on what it means. When you visit or interact with another culture, the local "social contract" takes precedence. Expecting an entire nation (or in this case, an imageboard) to rewrite their cultural vocabulary to fit your personal habits is an uphill battle you will lose every time.
I don't think anybody expects you to to know every rule instantly. But once you do know, choosing to keep defying them isn't asserting independence, it's deliberately choosing to be a nuisance. No one will bend the knee or take you seriously.
No.42653
>>42652>"social contract"I don't remember signing that K U S O
No.42654
>>42652>unironically bringingnup the social contractSocial contracts havent mattered ever since it became impossible to earn a decent wage or get a virgin wife
If society doesnt hold up its end of the contract I dont have to hold up mine
No.42655
>>42654Who are you quoting and why are you bringing up 3DPD?
No.42658
what are you retards arguing about anyways, the only reason the og thread was considered /polg/ was because some 'tard posted St. Davis and then vermin had an autism fit and now we're here.
No.42659
>>42658Always gotta use your distaste towards me as an excuse to start degrading the site into /pol/ crap
No.42660
>>42657"The honey outweighs the poison!", the man said.
"But why do you eat the honey that's poisoned?", the man was asked.
No.42661
>>42659So somehow by the grace of god its my fault for pointing out what happened (which anyone can see if they look at /trans/).
The OP is a kuso stirring retard and you should've had a firmer hand.
No.42663
>>42661I would like to defend myself. I only ever posted >>>/trans/33173
I just wanted to make a funny, silly thread (See:
>>>/poll/12926). It's not my fault that instead of deleting this retard >>>/trans/33175, or deleting the /pol/ concern troll >>33176, verm decided to nuke the whole thread, or that Anonymous would then go on a crusade to defend my honor and repost the thread four more times, trying to explain my intentions... (>>>/trans/33179 >>>/trans/33180 >>>/trans/33181
>>42597)
No.42664
I don't want this on /secret/, send it somewhere else please...
No.42666
How did posting terry davis cause such a sperg out
No.42667
>>42666Someone on the mod team feels entitled to have what he likes be immune to reports and deletes.
No.42668
>>42663That's what I was trying to get at, it was the Terry Davis posting that caused the spergout.
No.42670
>In Protestant Reformation history, confessionalization is the parallel processes of "confession-building" taking place in Europe between the Peace of Augsburg (1555) and the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648).
>This confession-building occurred through "social-disciplining," as there was a stricter enforcement by the churches of their particular rules for all aspects of life in both Protestant and Catholic areas. This had the consequence of creating distinctive confessional identities that influenced church dogma, faith formation, liturgy, and the development of universities.
There's this really interesting phenomenon that happened in the Late Middle Ages: the population became far more faithful, far more ardent, far more filled with the Holy Spirit, and this was seen as a regeneration, a path forward for fixing all of society's very real problems. But it ended up killing Christianity as a societal force and set us up with the liberal doctrine of "you gotta tolerate each other or we will all literally die". Modernity as we know it is a reaction against confessionalization.
I think something not entirely dissimilar happened to the internet in the 2010s. Heightened antagonisms led to the formation of politically-driven communities and the average user became something closer to an armchair activist, soapboxing on social media and policing their peers and enemies alike through harrassment and mockery. The precursor to this isn't to be found in vague, general anti-establishment Guy Fawkes messaging but in something like the fight between New Atheists and Evangelicals, that's the conflict that was both heavily publicized and heavily tied to people's identity. It was then around the time of Elevatorgate that New Atheists split into the side of anti-feminist compilation debatebros that'd fuel the tard-right and the side of reddit libtards who fucking love science (and still hate religion bcuz it's so regressive, man). Much of the internet was assimilated into perpetual blood sports.
That's, I think, the main way things have changed. But one alternative began to take shape in response, and that was to shut it all down, to reject activization by rejecting politics. Think of the sort of guy who correctly says /pol/ took over 4chan then incorrectly says beforehand racism wasn't important or somesuch. To attempt to crush politics and build an apolitical oasis is reasonable, but it's also as much a break from the past as activization is. I think the problem here is that our dear immoderator wants a more chaotic site, wants more diversity of opinion and expression, but is mixing up his ideals with the fact that people don't care about the edit, they care about the loaded political term still present in it.
No.42671
>>42670The thread is about murdering people with a tint of political satire, being defended by a psychotic mod who believes in freedom more than comnmunity
No.42673
>>42671>The thread is about murdering people with a tint of political satireChill the fuck out dude, the OP just wanted to shitpost
No.42674
Did any of you guys watch the latest AVGN episode?
No.42676
>>42674I haven't watched AVGN in years...
No.42677
I never watched AVGN
No.42678
>>42674AVGN is still alive??
No.42682
bet
No.42688
>>42676>>42677>>42678He's still been doing stuff all these years, though the quality dropped significantly during the 2010s and nowadays a lot of it just feels forced, especially the nerd rants. Or in my opinion at least.
The most recent episode had a surprise, something that hasn't been a thing for over 10 years or so. It was nice to see, though sparked a lot of questions because
Kyle Justin seemed to be completely out of it, as if he was severely sick or recovering from some illness.
No.42692
He was bought out by a big media company and became an employee in the franchise he created
No.42694
>>42688He really should just shave the rest of that off...
No.42695
>>42686You don't even respond to the umamusume posts I've been making in #qa for you...
>>42688>he quality dropped significantly during the 2010s and nowadays a lot of it just feels forced, especially the nerd rants.I thought it was well known that he no longer writes his own episodes. Personally, I think it's for the best. The Calvin and Hobbes theory is you either quit at the peak so you're remembered fondly, or you keep going until you're irrelevant and lose the spark of creativity. In my opinion, James found a middle ground where to a viewer who doesn't have that context, his newer episodes read like character development where he's mellowed out instead of like a parody of his earlier work that don't understand the original pull.
No.42701
hoes mad but replace "hoes" with "vern's"
No.42702
I saw the original /poll/ post last night right before I went to sleep and prepared for a gay meta scuffle the next morning. I checked /trans/ immediately after waking up but this gay meta war is way bigger than I could have anticipated. Sasuga /qa/.
No.42703
>>42627This. Maybe I just have low self esteem as a 2025 refugee but I still consider myself a guest here and I try to maintain 和.
No.42704
>>42668So while everyone else was discussing the word 'liberal' and whether it's appropriate to use in a joke/shitpost, Verniy was having a meltdown over an unrelated Terry Davis reply and that's why we're here?
No.42705
>>42704I really don't get the problem with Terry, he was a great guy.
No.42706
>>42695I'm not control+f 'ing through all of /chat/ for uma every day
No.42708
>>42704It's hilarious isn't it.
No.42710
>>42709Why is he dinnerbone
No.42714
>>42683He does and I'm on the top.
No.42715
>>42667I should be immune to reports and deletes, freak.
No.42716
Bleh. I'll come out of hiding and writhing in bed with pre-tooth canal pain since people are talking about it in mod chat.
I am against the thread or any other that seeks to create division. It's one I would have purged instantaneously on old kissu and received the requisite "fuck u hope you die janny don't delete my redpills" thread of replies from the cavalcade of parasitic antisocial wastrels that eventually kill every imageboard after withering down every moderator that resists them. It was my time to feel the weight of that so I've been taking an extended break. Hopefully not everyone here has the type of autism where they can't understand that other people have human emotions and understand why it was I wanted to leave and enjoy myself again.
"Then why did you become mod if you wanted to be seen as human deserving of basic decency?" That's a good question, but one I can't answer.
History is simply repeating as it always does: give people the freedom they want and they make a clone of every other imageboard. People are not unique and special; they follow patterns. They want politics. They want shitposting. They want conflict and anger. They want the blase ubiquitous of apathy and irony because positive emotions open them to judgment. They want shallow performative connections to people that can easily be severed instead of thinking deeply and bonding over shared experiences and values because those things open them to betrayal.
Kissu gained a lot of 4chan people at once, and continues to do so, and kissu is adapting to 4chan/twitter culture instead of people being forced to adapt to kissu. I'm not saying all the bad posts are from new people, no, a lot of crap is coming from older users that no longer feel my gaze on them forcing them to behave. It's unfortunate to see the illusion of shared cultural values broken like this, but that's how it goes.
This is not a kissu thread, at least not the way I moderated it for the first six years which slowed its growth for the sake of community cohesion. This is not about Lucky Star any more than a red MAGA hat on Momiji is about Touhou. It's a perversion of the character to advance a social goal: to "other" liberals. What a liberal is for OP is up to interpretation as it always is, but it's an enemy.
It should offend anyone that has ever thought "I really like Japanese doujin culture" or "This character is beautiful and so well written". This video is the modern inauthentic tripe where someone paints over some social media crap with "anime aesthetics" because it's cool these days. Anything beautiful or cute has to be corrupted because it's so cool and unexpected and not at all what has been done 50,000 times before that month for the sake of chasing the algorithm. It bothers me that the same people that seek out Japanese media for its authenticity are so quick to insult and mock it for the very same thing. Kissu still labels itself as an otaku culture imageboard instead of a netouyo board I assume?
Pause for a moment and ask yourself if this is a thread you expect on kissu or instead a thread on 4chan or gnfos or wojakland or twitter? Or rather, the kissu of say 3 years ago.
What is the goal of the thread? Will it make people feel more welcome? Will people bond over shared thoughts and feelings? Will people feel good or will they feel worse? Will it bring closer together or farther apart?
I again feel compelled to share my "death from a thousand cuts" thing. This thread won't cause kissu's death on its own but it makes kissu weaker as a community. There is zero doubt in my mind about this. Driveby shitposting against 'others' doesn't build or foster a community, it creates an atmosphere of paranoia and suspicion as people await their turn to be othered, or perhaps they will make the next declaration of a target for the hyena to pounce upon. This is also why I absolutely loathe the /r9k/ "norms" thing, but that's been grandfathered in by /jp/ spinoffs as part of hobbyist discussion somehow.
Looking at >>>/jp/121443 the process of "othering" is already well under way as people tear each other apart because they no longer see kissu as a unified group and instead expect antagonistic judgment in another corner of the board somewhere.
What people do from here will determine the future of kissu as a place for fun hobbyists passionate about things or a loose-knit collective of bored people that are simply here to pass the time and feel no bond with another and instead await the next dose of stimulation from an image dump or politically charged shitpost. You can decide if I'm insane or if I'm the canary in the coalmine.
Well, that being said I'm heading back to IRC and I don't want to post again until September, outside of the seasonal stream announcements of course.
No.42717
>>42716>emotions open them to judgment>open them to betrayal. Man I hate how my brain repeats sentence structures like this, it makes the paragraph seem so bad as a result.
No.42718
>>427164chin is dying, and 4/jp/ is doing too even faster.
More refugees are bound to come here.
You can:
-Try to (somehow) make them learn "kissu culture"
or
-Nuke them once they step out of line (ends up alienating uninvolved people)
As a regular user I must remind you that mod spergouts are very funny.
No.42719
>>42716There needs to be cultural enforcement of some sort on the site, new people can't integrate into kissu culture if there is nobody around to teach them that culture. Doubly so if what
>>42718 says is true and there will be even more people coming here in the future. While I think most people from the hack and the 4/jp/ autosage have adapted fairly well, I still see posts here and there that look like they were taken straight out of 4chan, and it bothers me that it often doesn't get dealt with in some way or another.
No.42720
>>42716>It's one I would have purged instantaneously on old kissu and received the requisite "fuck u hope you die janny don't delete my redpills" thread>It's a perversion of the character to advance a social goal: to "other" liberals. What a liberal is for OP is up to interpretation as it always is, but it's an enemy.I know you've mentioned you don't use the moderation UI and try to moderate based off content rather than posters, but it truly disappoints me to still see this interpretation after I said
>>42663. I never tried re-making the thread, or defended it's worthiness to stay. I was the one that asked that this fifth incarnation either get deleted or moved to /secret/. I really don't care that the original thread was deleted -- I really did just want to make an unserious thread like I subsequently made
>>>/poll/12926. It saddens me that you would assume such cynical motivations. I made the thread on a whim after seeing the video and that was all.
I sparingly post, so seeing such absolute conviction of my villainy makes me
wish that you had been following my posts to get a better idea of myself. I post videos and pictures in the hamster thread, post my cat occasionally in the cat thread, post about my tech interests on /maho/, post (a few) pictures here and there on the seasonal boards, and post things I like on /ec/ & /megu/ -- alongside heavy usage of #qa. I would hope that I don't give off the impression of being a nefarious poster, but I feel the need to reply since you have critiqued my intentions and character in a direct manner, clearly without having any frame of reference to how I preoccupy myself on Kissu. I don't think it's productive to contribute to the fearful and paranoid attitude of posters in this thread.
* * *
This juxtaposition feels a bit ironic. You would lambast me for making stupid meta threads, and being cynical about the state of Kissu, for whining about /secret/ and posts I overreacted towards, and yet here you are doing the exact same. I won't fault you for feeling the same as I have. I hope my at times miserable attitude hasn't worn off on you, and I'm sorry if I have influenced your thinking. You've been saying that Kissu isn't moving in a productive direction, but I'm really not seeing any indication of that being the case at the moment. If you're currently in a depressive spiral that's clouding your judgement as I have experienced, I would just like to remind you of your own words
>>>/test22/63 and say that you were right. It just takes time for people to move out of their comfort zone and interact in other places. The
only thing I could possibly point to that I personally find off would be the occasional western media reaction image, but I don't see any malice from such posts -- they're just clearly out-of-place, unassimilated.
>I don't want to post again until September, outside of the seasonal stream announcements of course.>>>/trans/33132 >>>/trans/32434I'm really not sure what's gotten you so persistently down on Kissu, and you deleting your threads (>>>/trans/32922 >>>/trans/32639) worries me a bit -- but if it wasn't caused by anything and you really just wanted them deleted for unrelated reasons (as I can relate to with this very thread...) that's fine. If you need to take a brake, take your time to recharge and come back with clear eyes. Doing so has helped me recalibrate my opinions on things and realize that many things I thought were indicative of some perceived decline were in actuality a reflection of my own negative emotional state transposed onto other posters, leading to cynicism about their behavior and the trajectory Kissu was on.
If you're going through it, I would like to remind you of your own words:
>>>/test22/89>I hope you know that you have people that care about you hereI, personally, often look to your opinions as north stars to right myself and your absence the past while has been felt, especially on #qa. It might not seem like that, but I assure you I mean it. Sorry if I've been a little shithead troublemaker in the past... I'm not sure our interests align, but please do reach out if you ever want to talk about things.
No.42722
>>42716If you can't see the difference between this and Momiji in a MAGA hat then you're definitely letting politics consume your mind far too much. The goal is not to 'other' liberals, the original context of the joke is that what a liberal is has no meaning to the person in the tractor. It's just a person that annoys him and that 'othering' itself is satirized.
As I said before, the imposition of Lucky Star onto the video adds a different dimension to what the viewer is meant to think
>>42649. The dehumanization in the driver's PoV, who's now Akira, is Shiraishi. Someone who if you need to be reminded she repeatedly dehumanizes and antagonizes in the Lucky Channel segments so the behavior in the OP video actually falls perfectly in line with something one would expect of her. Thus the comedic angle of the video instead of some "LIBTARDS OWNED" backwards logic you're applying to it.
No.42772
>>42720>I sparingly post, so seeing such absolute conviction of my villainy makes me wish that you had been following my posts to get a better idea of myself. I post videos and pictures in the hamster thread, post my cat occasionally in the cat thread, post about my tech interests on /maho/, post (a few) pictures here and there on the seasonal boards, and post things I like on /ec/ & /megu/ -- alongside heavy usage of #qa. I would hope that I don't give off the impression of being a nefarious poster, but I feel the need to reply since you have critiqued my intentions and character in a direct manner, clearly without having any frame of reference to how I preoccupy myself on Kissu.He does this to anyone.
No.42782
>>42621>>42622Thanks, I appreciate it. I'll continue to rule IRC with an iron fist so there is one place that is unchanging.
>>42720I didn't say or mean that you were a bad person. I said it was a damaging thread that I would have culled for hurting kissu's sense of comradery. One staff member said it was a thread that deserved deletion and another said it was a thread worth preserving, so I had to give my tie-breaking vote and my reasoning for it in a thread that was now hidden from the main page. I would have posted earlier but I've been semi-comatose.
I would have deleted the thread and moved on (and received the community backlash for it) but that's it. I'm of the opinion that posts should be judged as they are instead of pulling an investigation on the poster to see if they get a reprieve. This is my attempt at being unbiased. I would only look at IP history if I was considering a ban, which I wouldn't for that situation.
>deleting your threads Some people are more sensitive to cultural changes I suppose. As someone said in another thread
>>42574 "kissu is low politics, not zero politics". That's not a change I agree with because it will grow as it always does, such as the need to filter "norm" because people can't keep their redpills in their pockets.
I didn't want Kuon or AiPri associated with the cultural/demographic shift so I deleted those threads of me talking to myself, but I didn't delete any thread with participation in it. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure and I would never forgive myself to see Kuon sharing page space with repugnant things.
(Bad memories of getting Sachiko on the front page of 4chan before 4chan got in the news for bad things and Sachiko was shown prominently alongside them)
>You would lambast me for making stupid meta threadsI never lambasted you, I was always there to talk to you about it I thought. I hope I never seemed condescending or rude.
>>42723The /a/ part of /amv/ was about ten people, just very active people for its size so if people are missing it's really obvious. I do think we've lost a few of them since the beginning of 2026. I remember a post on /poll/ where someone said "It (kissu) used to remind me of old /a/ but since the hack it's modern /jp/". There's really nothing you can do when people respond to changes unfavorably, each person has their own preferences.
Part of the issue is "front page culture" where /jp/ typically dominates, which has only grown with more 4/jp/ people around so /amv/ threads get buried quickly. If you're not there when someone else is talking about the anime during a specific time of the day on a specific day of the week then you simply won't see the thread at all unless you look for it, and people absolutely hate looking for threads. High participation rate with a minority population has quirks people need to work around.
No.42796
Oh, and in case someone wants my opinion on the Terry thing. He was a mentally ill guy that 4chan and kiwifarms bullied to death for fun. He deserved help instead of open mockery. The culture around it gave rise to some buzzwords, one of which is also now filtered on kissu newly this year because of cultural changes. There was an attempt to defuse it with a silly filter instead of deletions so people knew that posting style was unwelcome.
In any community where mutual respect is desired, particularly towards people struggling with mental illness (which is common on imageboards) such a thing should never be allowed.
That's my opinion and you're welcome to your own.
No.42798
>>42611dumb argumentative shitposter
No.42799
>>42716Are you the kissuer who's been putting off his dentist visits.... sigh.... kono baka....
No.42814
As long as a thread is not antagonistic or argumentative, it should be fine. Pervy funposts should be allowed on /jp/.
No.42816
You spend a few weeks off kissu and miss...an entire few weeks worth of arguing. Maybe I should add the boards back to my feed...
No.42851
>>42650All time post.
In a past /secret/ thread about excess gayposting on /jp/ (a problem which I think has been entirely fixed because most people were not as retarded as the person I'm about to reference), an ex 8channer miraculously determined "Kissu leans politically to the left," which I suppose is true relative to 8chan but lmao. The schizo's impression that kissu is left wing comes, I imagine, from the fact that those users who are leftist tend to keep that to themselves (as do most right wingers, who I assume are the silent majority in any space like this), while a certain section of right wingers either can't help themselves (thanks
>>42654 and your creepy 3DPD fantasies) or do not even know they are failing to help themselves, much like the man with his aunt in the already quoted all time post. Therefore, mods delete right wingers more than left wingers, which apparently means they are left wing?
The 8channer in the gayposting thread was not a poster on the masturbation thread, nor on most gay threads really, but he did make the most rancid posts on some of the worst threads (at least if I've tracked the kissunons correctly). His type is capable of posting on this site while moderated, but if allowed to run wild will cause the most damage. When naive, accidental politics are allowed on the site, then his type will infest the site with /pol/ kuso immediately. Actually, because the foremost worry should be becoming /pol/, we might (because it is true that the video wasn't sooo political, and in fact everything has some tie to politics if you dig long enough) define "political posts" as those posts which open space for the worst /pol/sters on earth.
TL;DR: moderation can look left wing even when mods aren't because the worst kind of 4chan colonization is from far right retards. "politics" doesn't require wanting to be political; it only requires giving room for /pol/ retards to kuso everywhere
No.42870
>>42851Makes sense, yeah. The "With us or against us" is very strong with politics, which is why I wanted a zero tolerance policy.
No.42896
>>42804what the... the interface is in russian!
No.42953
im gay!!!
No.42965
>>42953everyone already knew this
No.42969
>>42851>those users who are leftist tend to keep that to themselvesThey do? That's news to me. You, for one, sure patted yourself on the back about it there.