Porn dumps are a scourge on imageboards.

Name4T*♊Y⚬⛈Sg=9Uh♺[W#r%G\dvI2F1Z`(y$+;'~wmA:86K^_La{oni⛅⚒p!CXVD)MfN♉5lP}3QJcB
Options
Comment15☫p.]yR♪EJ2/k<ao⚔DZ}6!wKjMFNf#x V♍g+(☽7SmU t%z$luq^=QI~[{B♆CLOn4\|G,-:'⛄cA⛝W3dPh\X8bYr`⛅_⚉e
File	Or URL:
Whitelist Token

Video Stream Embedding
Advanced Options	Always Noko Always Sage
Video Timestamp
Captcha Type	Captchouli
Spoiler	Unset Spoiler Image NSFW Image
Password	(For file deletion.)
Markup tags exist for bold, itallics, header, spoiler etc. as listed in " [options] > View Formatting "

File:98910675_p1.jpg (1.11 MB,1295x1977)

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 05:45:01 No.143818

Porn dumps are a scourge on imageboards.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 05:45:39 No.143820

No content, no discussion, no engagement. Truly banal entertainment replaceable by anyone.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 05:49:14 No.143822

Well, maybe specifically on boards not created for that purpose. It's true that they don't serve as much of a purpose today in the age of boorus and broadband. It can be a good way to discover new artists still, I think, but on boards made for that purpose.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 05:51:31 No.143825

>>143822
discovering artists requires discussion, but how it's used is just a fap and go. Asking for sources or any sort of discussion is forbidden.

If it were all removed in place of discussion of a single artwork it would be interesting but people just post a couple images as part of their fetish and ditch. Does nothing for anyone.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 05:59:05 No.143827

>>143825
That's fair, although I wouldn't really have much to say about artists unless they work outside of porn. "Did you see that doujin?" "Yeah." "Cool."

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:08:05 No.143831

>>143822
>>143825
"Discovering artists" will not be a thing in 10 years thanks to AI.
>>143827
Art discussion can go beyond that, but it usually doesn't for some reason.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:14:28 No.143838

File:1337968925646.png (491.23 KB,1925x1650)

>>143825
I post because it brings me joy, and on Kissu there's a score system to see if other people liked the image. I generally try to post things that I think other people will like. Personally, I'm not particularly a fan of feet, for instance, but there's one particular poster who I know does enjoy them, so when searching for things I try to also find things they might enjoy. >>>/ec/15712 >>>/ec/15713

>If it were all removed in place of discussion of a single artwork it would be interesting but people just post a couple images as part of their fetish and ditch.
Honestly, I don't think most people are educated enough in art critique to be able to properly express what they like or dislike in an image and why they feel that way other than "this looks bad" or "I like this." Even supposing they can explain their reasoning, most people are ignorant of what goes into producing art to be able to formulate a coherent critique so the number of people that could engage in such a discussion would be rather limited. In my experience, imageboard laymen really only talk about "style" which is the most surface level discussion you can have about a piece of art.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:19:12 No.143839

File:1732781201236008.png (807.09 KB,1000x900)

>>143831
>Art discussion can go beyond that, but it usually doesn't for some reason
When it does happen it's pretty nice. I think it also has to do with how engaged you are with the subject matter. Someone casually browsing all the art for various gacha's and characters might not have much of anything to say, but someone waifufagging a specfic character would know a lot about different artists that are prominent in drawing that character, they'd be more acquainted with artstyle in general and could describe why they like or dislike this or that. Leads me to my next point and there can be a lot more context attached to different artists and styles, the different characterizations of a character through doujins gives quite a lot to talk about. Of course this is coming from my own experience of waifufagging and looking at art of her almost exclusively, so actual experience may vary.
>>143838
Wait there's a whole score system I didn't know about? What I get for not paying attention I guess.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:24:43 No.143841

File:Screenshot 2025-04-16 at 0….png (110.57 KB,781x312)

>>143839
>Wait there's a whole score system I didn't know about?
It's purely cosmetic and does not affect bump or visibility or anything like that. Posts can only have their score increased, not decreased. The concept was to have a system similar to Futaba where users can そうだね a post. This post is from the cat board on Futaba, for example. そうだねx14.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:25:46 No.143843

>>143838
>I don't think most people are educated enough in art critique
Fair enough. It's a tricky thing to have a conversation about unless you're a theory otaku. I'd only really be able to say which parts of the image appeal to my taste. I could maybe talk about the poses but it would be a bit unnecessary because I'm not an artist.
The value of an image is then, nothing conversation worthy. Because all it is is reposting content for other people's enjoyment, like creating a board of kopipe. If the enjoyment is for the user and contributing to a collection of tastes, then it does have value, but not as something people can contribute to. Low value.

In the hierarchy of value it's pretty low on the list.
If someone were to upload each page of a doujin it would create much more conversation and people would critique it from multiple angles of story/art/pacing.
So someone could put in more effort and produce something that has a higher collective value.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:26:51 No.143845

That has a higher collective value while also following the idea of imagedumping

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:39:19 No.143848

File:_1542.png (37.35 KB,256x256)

>>143843
>If someone were to upload each page of a doujin it would create much more conversation and people would critique it from multiple angles of story/art/pacing.
I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but this is more or less the original conception behind boorus. The idea being that it would be a sort of alternative format of imageboard with discussion downstream of an image. Needless to say, the comments on boorus like gelbooru, danbooru, sankaku, r34, etc. all pretty much boil down to "boy, I sure would love to do that" with little exception. Ironically, the place that seems to have the most meta/critique is Exhentai, in my experience. Though that tends moreso to focus on the quality of scans, typesetting, and translation instead of the doujin art itself.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:41:15 No.143849

>>143838
>Personally, I'm not particularly a fan of feet
What is wrong with you?

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:51:14 No.143851

>>143841
4 months of studying and I still come across walls of entirely unfamiliar kanji...
しょうもないね

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:56:30 No.143854

>>143843
Doujin storytimes?
Doujinshi Dailies?
Fapping w/ the bros?
Tell me which page you came to, fellas.
>>143848
Honestly what kind of discussion is there to be had?
There's clearly demand for it. A lot of people just LIKE sharing images. And a LOT LOT LOT of people like being able to browse a thread and see a bunch of images. Being slightly "curated" by virtue of most threads having long strings of posts from one guy's collection helps, too.
The only other type of discussion I usually see is just ERP nonsense or rarely "stories" (95% of which I'm sure are made up) but that sort of posting usually just gets really gay and obnoxious really fast.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:57:41 No.143855

>>143851
*しょうがないね

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 06:58:00 No.143856

File:yamete.jpg (55.89 KB,590x468)

>>143831
>"Discovering artists" will not be a thing in 10 years thanks to AI.

where the hell do you freaks come from

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 07:08:19 No.143859

>>143818
But I get horny sometimes and I like fapping with the bros in a not gay way

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 07:19:28 No.143867

File:FE5VEy-acAA9Abo.mp4 (849.63 KB,1280x852)

>>143818
Just use the newer UI and toggle /ec/ off.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 07:29:26 No.143875

>>143856
Gomen, you're mistaken. I'm not one of those AI shills. Looking back at that post, however, I can definitely understand why you'd think that. They use much the same language.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 13:23:27 No.144087

>>143818
Dumb argumentative shitposter.
>>143820
Dumb argumentative shitposter.
>>143825
Dumb argumentative shitposter.
>>143838
>Personally, I'm not particularly a fan of feet, for instance, but there's one particular poster who I know does enjoy them, so when searching for things I try to also find things they might enjoy.
Thank you, that's very kind of you. Then I'll try to post more Laala and Kuon maybe...

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 13:33:39 No.144089

>>143838
there isn't a need to cater to fetishists. you're just encouraging them to spam their fetish outside of their containment threads.

Anonymous 04/16/25 (Wed) 15:13:14 No.144146

File:(｀・ω・´).jpg (23.92 KB,599x357)