>>109726Well, by "curated" I meant more that it's not going to be 80% dead links or political activism stuff.
>>109732That thing you mentioned seems cool, but I think waiting for 4chan to be completely destroyed won't give it much use any time soon. How would you even spread it to people at that point?
>If the aim is to help posters stuck on 4chan find better imageboards for their interests, ccd0 could add an item to the 4chan X top bar that...Although that does sound cool, it doesn't really have the same kind of reach and is difficult to spread. How would you tell people to find it? "First go download 4chanx, then do this" when we're trying to convince people to not just sit in a 4chan thread and complain all day. It's also thrusting more work onto ccd0 and turns it into a singular thing for one person to manage.
>>109739What doesn't matter?
>>109744Wiki, huh. Yeah, that could be a cool thing, although it requires people to expend more effort to find stuff than a list.
As for opt-in versus opt-out. Well, I wouldn't want to be responsible for wiping out a board by putting it on a list when they weren't prepared for spam or anything. The idea is that this list's existence would be at worst neutral, and not actively harm anything.
(This is all theoretical talk anyway, I can't make websites)