No.78406
>>78405>made by a hentai studioSeriously? That would explain why it looks so cheap.
No.78407
It's quite something how hentai studios have such a cheap and low budget art style
No.78408
Their previous listed work on anilist (might be others, don't feel like looking on other sites right now)
https://anilist.co/anime/129801/Kuro-Gal-ni-Natta-kara-Shinyuu-to-Shitemita/"I Turned Into a Gyaru and Tried out My Best Friend"
hehe
No.78411
>>78409I'm not gay, but I came to this manga.
No.78416
Yeah, the shading is fantastic in the source material. Probably too much to ask for what is basically an amateur-ish hentai studio. What's crazy is that this anime short has its own anime short companion thing:
https://anilist.co/anime/179212/Naoekun-wa-Yasesasetai/I assume it's on youtube or nico or something? Well probably not nico since it might still be dead...
No.78480
>>78479it has an itty bitty horn but it's won't hurt you it's friendly you can see it in its eyes
No.78529
heheheh
No.78533
>>78475that's what happens with hentai so is this really a surprise?
No.78537
>>78533I haven't seen hentai in like 15 years, but I suppose so. Ecchi stuff does generally seem to have higher quality. I guess things are just destined to be this way.
...although this isn't a hentai show...
No.78667
Man, this stuff should be right up my alley, but I feel nothing. I think a major part of it is that they're just there nude without any story connected to it. There's no titillation or teasing, it's just BOOM nudity everywhere. It's nudist nudity instead of erotic nudity. I'm sure this is great for teenagers and stuff, but it's just so boring and unerotic for me.
It lacks the great poses and shading like you see here
>>78413Oh, well. I'll keep watching it since it's a short, but I'm disappointed.
No.78671
>>78668>hard to make mermaids uncutegive them futa dicks thats how
No.78701
>>78671it could be cute if it like, just looks like an extra scaly section till its in action