Nuance clarification-oriented tier scale of discourse strictness, for discourse with at least some cooperation to it:
[Logic Combat]What's this, Umineko!? Danganronpa!?Like reinventing the wheel to answer the physics teacher question you don't know the easy answer for while he criticizes your every step!
CASUALLY CLARIFYING FOR IMPLICATIONS CAN BE MISTAKEN FOR STRAW MAN AND WHATABOUTISM. THEIR CONTENTS WILL HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED IF THEY'RE ACTUALLY IMPORTANT, ANYWAY
[Constrained Lecture]You're there to just deliver your points and push them through via argumentation against counterpoints.
CASUALLY CLARIFYING FOR IMPLICATIONS CAN BE MISTAKEN FOR STRAW MAN AND WHATABOUTISM. THOSE WILL BE TREATED POORLY, NOBODY'S HAVING ANY OF THAT
[Bantz]Anything goes for fun, and clarifying your boundaries is normal.
STRAW MAN AND WHATABOUTISM ARE INHERENT HERE, AND CAN EASILY BACKFIRE INTO BEING BANTERED AGAINST YOU
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.