S should also be 20 or 25 cm smaller to be peak

LL out of pity

M is the superior one

>>3558
20 years ago she would have been considered L. Yes she's perfect

S probably has the best personality

I wonder why LL is so comparatively unpopular. I guess you might as well go all the way and maximize the plump if that's your preference?

>>3561
Probably, it's just an in-between option that has no real stand out points of its own not emphasized better by 3L

>>3561
LL is like a moped. Fun to ride but you don't want your friends to see you doing it.

>>3563
>>3561
I wanted to add. If there were a true choice between S and M I would have voted for it. I wonder how many others would have. It was the ideal body type promoted by the media before thick came into vogue.

Basically M's top with S's bottom.

Which one's the most ticklish?

>>3564
M's bottom with S's top
>>3565
I assume the fatter, the less sensitive

More meat would normally be better, but LL has a better shape than 3L. The fact that her arms don't gain some level of fat is also strange looking.

M is nice and lean but not entirely my taste. L is on the upper end of preference and I wouldn't want to go much further. Really it's not about the fat, it's about the distribution and overall proportions. Too much ass and thighs and she looks like Midna. Too much boobie and she's a cow. In between there's a healthy balance of pudge, breasts, and childbearing hips; squishy and huggable, but not corpulent.

>>5083
>corpulent
i find this word quite funny because in other other languages it means "big-bodied", having a large corpus in general, but in english it took on the specific meaning of ffffFAT
>Too much ass and thighs and she looks like Midna
pic is s-tier though

3L
need slampig miku buhiiii

LL speaks to me

hi roon

should be multiple choice

if there was a size between S and M, I'd pick that

>>5087
Drumstick lolis are cute and have a mesugaki feel, but I like to think of her being just the right height to faceplant her boobs in a hug. A big soft hug you could really lean into would be blissful.

>>5097
>Drumstick lolis
i'm gonna use that in the future
oh about this
>Really it's not about the fat, it's about the distribution and overall proportions.
with this artist it's definitely about the fat, different levels of fat for the same person
i, personally, prefer someone i can lift with my two hands and toss around, so i wouldn't go for anyone above the height of 160cm, especially not a fattie

>>5098
>with this artist it's definitely about the fat
Yeah, I figured on that. I was more referring to a general case regardless of fetish; you can have a bunch of fat, but it just depends on where it's distributed as the same weight can vary from attractive and curvy — one could say voluptuous even — to "good god you're shaped like a pear". Small girls have their charm, you can pick them up whenever and they're easy to handle: the 40 kg Megumin meme comes to mind. But back to the proportion thing, if they're heavy then they should be tall. I post Ran a lot and I like to imagine she's got a good 15-25 kg in tails alone depending on fur and muscle density (really depends on how you headcanon if their strength is represented in part by actual muscle or all handwaved by magic), combine with height around a 190 cm ballpark and she's pretty heavy. I could manage to princess carry her, but tossing or swinging around is out of the question, that'll probably throw my back out.

>>5098
gross realistic fat

>>5091
hello