[ home / bans / all ] [ qa / jp ] [ win ] [ f / ec ] [ b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new / tab ]

/b/ - Boson Technology

Also known as Boson /g/

New Reply

Options
Comment
File
Whitelist Token
Spoiler
Password (For file deletion.)
Markup tags exist for bold, itallics, header, spoiler etc. as listed in " [options] > View Formatting "


[Return] [Bottom] [Catalog]

File:[Coalgirls]_Cardcaptor_Sak….jpg (132.3 KB,960x720)

 No.9583

Are youtube embeds a good or bad thing? On one hand they give a preview to and quick access to the content surrounding a post/thread, and on the other they're an easy way for certain people to tard out and get their thread immediately judged and disregarded because it's more a crutch for not having an image.

 No.9587

I think you could say the same thing about videos as well. Generally, in my experience, if you're trying to make a thread about a video, unless it's like 30 seconds long, people aren't going to watch the whole thing and will only either talk about the title or whatever you've written in the OP.

 No.9588

they're bad because:
- You are a sensitive person who can't separate image from subject.
For example, if a wojack image is posted it is dismissed because it is a wojack and not because it's subject is negative to the site.
- Vichan sucks and there's no easy way to set up spoilers on them.

 No.9590

Well, as long as people post them in enhance a post or start a discussion instead of a "look at this" I don't see a problem. People do that with images, too, though, so the answer is "it depends".

 No.9591

>>9588
>For example, if a wojack image is posted it is dismissed
that's due to the nature of the frogs-feels pseudo complex
I'd explain it to you but you'd need a phd in /qa/-ology to understand

 No.9620

I think youtube embeds are bad because they discourage standalone copies of the video file.

 No.9624

File:emiya.jpg (34.07 KB,600x450)

>>9620
I don't understand.

 No.9625


 No.9640

They're pretty much useless because you can't see what it's about before clicking and I wont click. I'd rather have something that transforms urls into the title.

 No.11836

testing embed of youtube shorts with url https://youtu.be/XzKHvOVIviE

 No.11837

>>11836
testing embed of youtube shorts with url >>11836" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" >https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XzKHvOVIviE>>11836
(it fails, says youtube/null and doesnt let me post)

 No.11838


 No.12020

>>9640
>I'd rather have something that transforms urls into the title.
wish granted




[Return] [Top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]

[ home / bans / all ] [ qa / jp ] [ win ] [ f / ec ] [ b / poll ] [ tv / bann ] [ toggle-new / tab ]